Site map

• Planning Policy Consultations
• Login
• Register
• Accessibility
• Privacy
• Cookies
• Instructions
• Historic consultations
• • Bitteswell Conservation Area
  • Representation search for Bitteswell Conservation Area
  • • Map of Bitteswell Conservation Area
    • 1.0 Summary of Special Interest
    • 2.0 Introduction
    • 3.0 Policy and Legislation
    • 4.0 Living and Working in a Conservation Area
    • 5.0 Character Location and Uses
    • 6.0 Definition of Special Interest
    • 7.0 Historic Development of the Area
    • 8.0 Assessment of Special Interest
    • 9.0 Opportunities for Enhancement
    • 10. Management Plan
    • • Representations made against Question 1 - Do you have any additional architectural or historical information that could support the Bitteswell Conservation Area Appraisal?
      • Representations made against Question 2 - Do you think the document identifies the special architectural and historic interest of the Bitteswell Conservation Area?
      • Representations made against Question 3 - Do you have any further comments?
    • 11.0 Council Contact Details
    • Sources
    • Appendix A: Listed Buildings and Scheduled Monuments
  • Local List of Heritage Assets, 2022 Update
  • Representation search for Local List of Heritage Assets, 2022 Update
  • • Proposed additions to the Harborough District Council Local List of Non-Designated Heritage Assets - October 2022
    • Consultation Questions
    • • Representations made against 2. Do you think the 11 new entries on the list continue to reflect the varied heritage of the Harborough district?
    • How to Make a Nomination
  • Harborough District Green Spaces - Quick Poll
  • Representation search for Harborough District Green Spaces - Quick Poll
  • • Existing Sites
    • New Sites
  • Planning Obligations SPD 2021
  • Representation search for Planning Obligations SPD 2021
  • • Harborough District Council Planning Obligations Supplementary Planning Document (SPD), re-consultation between 5 November and 17 December 2021.
    • 1.0 INTRODUCTION
    • 2.0 POLICY ON PLANNING OBLIGATIONS
    • • Representations made against Question 1
      • Representations made against Question 2
    • 3.0 MANAGING PLANNING OBLIGATIONS
    • 4.0 TRIGGER POINTS FOR PLANNING OBLIGATIONS
    • 5.0 AFFORDABLE HOUSING
    • 6.0 COMMUNITY FACILITIES
    • 7.0 OPEN SPACE, SPORT AND RECREATION PROVISION
    • • Representations made against Question 11
    • 8.0 HEALTHCARE
    • 9.0 COMMUNITY SAFETY
    • 10.0 HOUSEHOLD WASTE & RECYCLING RECEPTICALS
    • • Representations made against Question 12
    • 11.0 BIODIVERSITY NET GAIN
    • • Representations made against Question 13
    • 12.0 SUSTAINABLE DRAINAGE
    • 13.0 BROADBAND CONNECTIVITY
    • • Representations made against Question 14
    • 14.0 LEICESTERSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL SERVICES
    • • Representations made against Question 15
    • ANNEX 1 : DRAFT PROPOSED INDEMNITY AGREEMENT
  • Harborough District Council Local List of Non-Designated Heritage Assets
  • Representation search for Harborough District Council Local List of Non-Designated Heritage Assets
  • • Introduction
    • What are the selection criteria?
    • What is the nomination process?
    • Local List of Non-Designated Heritage Assets
    • Appendix A - Local List – Assessment Scoring System
  • Shearsby Conservation Area Appraisal and Management Plan 2021
  • Representation search for Shearsby Conservation Area Appraisal and Management Plan 2021
  • • 1.0 Summary of Special Interest
    • 2.0 Introduction
    • 3.0 Policy and Legislation
    • 4.0 Living and Working in a Conservation Area
    • 5.0 Character Location and Uses
    • 6.0 Definition of Special Interest
    • 7.0 Historic Development of the Area
    • 8.0 Assessment of Special Interest
    • 9.0 Opportunities for Enhancement
    • 10.0 Management Plan
    • • Representations made against Do you have any further comments?
    • 11.0 Council Contact Details
    • Appendix A: Listed Buildings and Scheduled Monuments
  • Call For Sites 2021
  • Representation search for Call For Sites 2021
  • • Introduction
    • Submit your site
  • Development Management Local Validation List
  • Representation search for Development Management Local Validation List
  • • 1 National Validation Requirements
    • • Representations made against QUESTION 1:
    • 2 Local Validation Requirements – Plans and drawings for householder applications.
    • • Representations made against QUESTION 2:
    • 3 Local Validation Requirements – Plans and drawings for all applications (excluding householder).
    • • Representations made against QUESTION 3:
    • 4 Local Validation Requirements – Information for specific application types.
    • • Representations made against QUESTION 4:
    • 5 Validation Requirements – Residential developments .
    • • Representations made against QUESTION 5:
    • 6 Validation Requirements – Information for Heritage proposals.
    • • Representations made against QUESTION 6:
    • 7 Validation Requirements – Supporting Information (all relevant proposals).
    • • Representations made against QUESTION 7:
  • Development Management SPD
  • Representation search for Development Management SPD
  • • 1 Introduction
    • • Representations made against QUESTION 1:
    • 2 Design principles
    • • Representations made against QUESTION 2:
    • 3 Residential development in the countryside
    • • Representations made against QUESTION 3:
    • 4 Conservation Areas and Listed Buildings
    • • Representations made against QUESTION 4:
    • 5 Employment and commercial development
    • • Representations made against QUESTION 5:
    • 6 Extensions to dwellings, garden extensions and working from home
    • 7 Agricultural, equestrian, and structures in the countryside
    • • Representations made against QUESTION 7:
    • 8 Addressing climate change
    • • Representations made against QUESTION 8:
    • 9 Conversion of redundant and disused buildings
    • • Representations made against QUESTION 9:
    • 10 Landscaping and development
    • • Representations made against QUESTION 10:
    • 11 Shop fronts and advertisements
    • Endnotes
  • Planning Obligations SPD 2020
  • Representation search for Planning Obligations SPD 2020
  • • 1. INTRODUCTION
    • 2. POLICY ON PLANNING OBLIGATIONS
    • 3. MANAGING PLANNING OBLIGATIONS
    • 4. OTHER ASPECTS OF PLANNING OBLIGATIONS
    • 5. AFFORDABLE HOUSING
    • 6. COMMUNITY FACILITIES
    • 7. OPEN SPACE, SPORT AND RECREATION PROVISION
    • 8. HEALTHCARE
    • 9. COMMUNITY SAFETY
    • 10. SUSTAINABLE DRAINAGE
    • 11. BROADBAND CONNECTIVITY
    • 12. LEICESTERSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL SERVICES
    • General questions
    • ANNEX 1: DEVELOPMENT TYPE AND CONTRIBUTIONS
    • ANNEX 2: REGISTERED PROVIDERS OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING
    • ANNEX 3 : DRAFT PROPOSED INDEMNITY AGREEMENT
    • ANNEX 4 : THE END to END S106 PLANNING OBLIGATIONS PROCESS
  • Statement of Community Involvement (Draft Sept 2019)
  • Representation search for Statement of Community Involvement (Draft Sept 2019)
  • • Introduction
    • The Planning System
    • Consultation Core Principles
    • Planning Policy Documents
    • Consulting on Planning Policy Documents
    • Neighbourhood Plans
    • Consulting on Planning Applications
    • Monitoring and Review
    • • Representations made against Question 8
    • Appendices
  • Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission
  • Representation search for Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission
  • • How to comment on this Document
    • Part A Strategy and General Policies
    • Part B Key Topics
    • Part C Places and Sites
    • Part D Appendices
    • • Representations made against Appendix F The Settlement Hierarchy
      • Representations made against Appendix G Housing trajectory
      • Representations made against Appendix H Heritage assets list
      • Representations made against Appendix I Local Green Space designations
  • Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Related Documents
  • Representation search for Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Related Documents
  • • Harborough Local Plan Habitat Regulations Assessment (HRA)
    • Duty to Co-operate Statement
    • Equalities Impact Assessment (EQIA)
    • • Representations made against Equalities Impact Assessment (EQIA)
    • Consultation Statement
    • Harborough Local Plan Sustainability Appraisal (SA)
    • • Representations made against Harborough Local Plan Sustainability Appraisal (SA)
      • Representations made against Harborough Sustainability Appraisal: Non-Technical Summary
      • Representations made against Harborough Sustainability Appraisal: Technical Appendix A Housing
      • Representations made against Harborough Sustainability Appraisal: Technical Appendix B Employment
  • Scraptoft Local Nature Reserve
  • Representation search for Scraptoft Local Nature Reserve
  • • Scraptoft Local Nature Reserve
  • Sustainability Appraisal - Second Interim SA Report Appraising Options for the Provision of Strategic Distribution Growth (Feb 2016)
  • Representation search for Sustainability Appraisal - Second Interim SA Report Appraising Options for the Provision of Strategic Distribution Growth (Feb 2016)
  • • Introduction
    • • Representations made against Q1. Do you have any comments to make on the Second Interim Sustainability Appraisal Report - Appraising Options for Strategic Distribution growth (Feb 2016)?
  • New Local Plan Options
  • Representation search for New Local Plan Options
  • • Foreword
    • 1. Introduction
    • 2. A brief portrait of Harborough District
    • 3. Vision and Objectives
    • • Representations made against Q1. Do you have any comments on the Draft Vision?
      • Representations made against Q2. Do you have any comments on the Draft Objectives, or any additional objectives to suggest?
    • 4. Sustainable Settlements
    • • Representations made against Harborough's Settlement Hierarchy
    • 5. Housing
    • • Representations made against Why do we need to build more houses?
      • Representations made against How many new houses do we need to build?
      • Representations made against Potential Strategic Development Areas
      • Representations made against Alternative Housing and Employment Options
      • Representations made against Option 1: Rural
      • Representations made against Option 2: Core Strategy Distribution
      • Representations made against Option 3: Urban
      • Representations made against Option 4: Scraptoft / Thurnby SDA
      • Representations made against Option 5: Kibworth SDA
      • Representations made against Option 6: Lutterworth SDA
      • Representations made against Option 7: Scraptoft / Thurnby SDA and Kibworth SDA
      • Representations made against Option 8: Scraptoft / Thurnby SDA and Lutterworth SDA
      • Representations made against Option 9: Lutterworth SDA and Kibworth SDA
      • Representations made against Testing the Options
      • Representations made against Q3. Which Housing and Employment Option(s) do you favour? You can select a single option, a number of options or suggest a new option. You can also tell us which options you don't like.
      • Representations made against How will new housing be delivered?
      • Representations made against Potential housing site allocations
      • Representations made against Development Management
      • Representations made against Q4. Do you have any comments on the proposed criteria-based policy to replace Limits to Development?
    • 6. Housing in the Countryside
    • • Representations made against Option C1: Strictly controlling development in the countryside
      • Representations made against Q5. Which is your preferred Option for Development in the Countryside?
    • 7. Affordable Housing
    • • Representations made against Proposed approach
    • 8. Gypsy and Traveller, and Travelling Showpeople Provision
    • • Representations made against How many Gypsy and Traveller pitches do we need to provide?
      • Representations made against How many Travelling Showpeople plots do we need to provide?
      • Representations made against How will future need be met?
      • Representations made against Q6. Would you like to submit any potential sites to accommodate gypsies and travellers, or travelling showpeople?
    • 9. Employment
    • • Representations made against Why do we need to provide land for more jobs?
      • Representations made against How much employment land do we need to provide?
      • Representations made against How will provision for new jobs and employment land be met?
      • Representations made against Q7. Do you have any comments on the list of employment sites proposed to be retained and protected?
      • Representations made against Where will new land for employment be provided?
      • Representations made against Continuing current distribution of Development (Options 1-3)
      • Representations made against Options involving delivery of 1 or 2 Strategic Development Areas (Options 4-9)
      • Representations made against Potential general employment site allocations
      • Representations made against Provision for Strategic Distribution
      • Representations made against Q8. Which Strategic Distribution Option(s) do you favour? You can select a single option, a number of options or suggest a new or hybrid option or suggest another location.
      • Representations made against Q9. Do you have any comments regarding the proposed policy approach for Bruntingthorpe Proving Ground?
      • Representations made against Q10. Do you have any comments regarding the proposed policy approach for Leicester Airfield?
    • 10. Green Infrastructure
    • • Representations made against Green Wedges
      • Representations made against Preventing the coalescence of settlements
      • Representations made against Q11. Which is your preferred option to prevent coalescence of settlements?
      • Representations made against Q12. Do you have any comments on the list of proposed Local Green Space?
    • 11. Town Centres and Retail
    • • Representations made against How much new retail floorspace is needed to 2031?
      • Representations made against Where should retail and town centre needs be met?
      • Representations made against Q13. Do you have any comments on the potentail retail sites? (Set out in Appendix I)
      • Representations made against Q14. Do you have any comments on the suggested Town Centre or Primary Shopping Area Boundary for Market Harborough?
      • Representations made against Proposed new Local Plan policy approach
    • 12. Infrastructure Planning
    • 13. Settlement Sections
    • • Representations made against Scraptoft, Thurnby and Bushby
      • Representations made against Billesdon
      • Representations made against Husbands Bosworth
      • Representations made against The Kibworths
      • Representations made against Ullesthorpe
      • Representations made against Selected Rural Villages
    • Appendix A: Neighbourhood Planning in Harborough District
    • Appendix B: Maps to illustrate Potential Strategic Development Areas
    • Appendix C: Housing Distribution Options - residual requirements
    • Appendix D: Illustration of the residual housing requirement under a proportionate increase
    • Appendix E: Outstanding Employment permissions and allocations - as at 31 March 2015
    • Appendix F: Existing Employment sites proposed for retention and protection
    • Appendix G: Maps showing Sites for Potential Employment Allocation
    • Appendix H: Employment Options - residual requirements by settlement
    • Appendix I: Maps to illustrate potential Strategic Distribution sites for Options A, B and C
    • Appendix J: Proposed Local Green Space sites
    • Appendix K: Potential Retail / Town Centre Uses Development Areas
    • Appendix L: Glossary
  • New Local Plan Options - Sustainability Appraisal Interim Report
  • Representation search for New Local Plan Options - Sustainability Appraisal Interim Report
  • • Sections 1-19, Appendix A, Appendix B
    • Appendix C
    • Appendix D
  • Open Spaces Strategy
  • Representation search for Open Spaces Strategy
  • • Chapter 1: Introduction to the Open Spaces Strategy
    • Chapter 2: What is the Open Spaces Strategy?
    • Chapter 3: What the Open Spaces Strategy will do.
    • • Representations made against 3.7 Enable Open Space
    • Chapter 4: Policy Context
    • Chapter 5: Strategy Vision
    • • Representations made against 5.4 The Open Spaces Strategy Vision is:
    • Chapter 6: The Benefits of Open Space
    • Chapter 7: Harborough District: Spatial Portrait and Open Space
    • • Representations made against 7.2 The People
    • Chapter 8: Current provision of Open Space in Harborough District
    • Chapter 9: Current Management Arrangements and Partnerships
    • • Representations made against 9.4 Arrangements for maintaining Open Space not in HDC control
    • Chapter 10: Harborough District Councils Open Spaces
    • Chapter 11 Future Management Proposals for Open Space in Harborough District
    • • Representations made against 11.3 New Open Space
      • Representations made against 11.4 Existing Open Space
      • Representations made against 11.5 HDC support for other organisations
    • Chapter 12: The value of Open Space to Business and the Local Community
    • Chapter 13: Minimum Provision, Accessibility and Quality Thresholds
    • • Representations made against 13.5 Quantity Provision Standard
    • Chapter 14: Aims of the Open Spaces Strategy
    • Chapter 15: Aim 1.The provision and maintenance of appropriate and good quality open space that is open to all and protected for future generations
    • • Representations made against 15.12 Objective 1: To ensure creatively designed and appropriate open spaces are provided on new developments that are accessible and support community requirements. Ensure that schemes are well desig
      • Representations made against 15.14 Objective 3: To develop a prioritised and strategic approach to open space improvements and that this remains an inclusive process.
    • Chapter 16: Aim 2. The natural environment, conservation and habitat is enhanced and protected
    • Chapter 17: Aim 3. To ensure open spaces are safe and litter free, and contribute towards a safe environment
    • Chapter 18: Aim 4. Voluntary groups are supported to use and manage open spaces
    • Chapter 19: Aim 5: Deliver value for money services when managing open space
    • Chapter 20: Aim 6. Open Space supports business and income is maximised
    • Chapter 21: Aim 7. Ensure that open spaces support health and wellbeing of local people
    • • Representations made against 21.7. Objective 22: Promote activities for open spaces use that are linked to health benefits
    • Chapter 22: Open Space Strategy Action Plan
    • Chapter 23: Consultation
    • Chapter 24: Strategy Review
    • Chapter 25: List of Appendices
    • Chapter 26 Introduction to Provision for Open Space Sport and Recreation
    • Chapter 27 Scope of the open space and sport and recreation consultation
    • • Representations made against 27.2. What is needed for the assessment of need for open space, sport and recreation?
    • Chapter 28 Open Space Calculations
    • Chapter 29 When will the policy be applied?
    • Chapter 30 What types of open space, sport and recreation facilities will require developer contributions?
    • Chapter 31 How will the policy operate?
    • Chapter 32 Where are the open spaces to be provided?
    • • Representations made against 32.12. How are commuted sums for the maintenance of open space calculated?
      • Representations made against 32.13. How is the provision open space to be secured?
    • Chapter 33 Appendix S: Developer contributions for new provision/enhancement of open space
    • Chapter 34 Appendix T: Developer Contributions towards the Future Maintenance Costs of Outdoor Play Space, Amenity Areas and other Open Spaces
  • Planning Obligations SPD
  • Representation search for Planning Obligations SPD
  • • Chapter 1: Preamble: Planning Obligations Supplementary Planning Document Consultation
    • • Representations made against Question 1: Is the document clear enough? If no, please suggest improvements.
      • Representations made against Question 2: Do you think the document covers the priorities for planning obligations arising from development? If no, what alternatives do you propose? Are there matters which should not be included w
      • Representations made against Question 3: Does the draft SPD comply with the requirements of national planning policy, guidance and relevant regulations such as the Community Infrastructure Levy regulations? If no please explain w
      • Representations made against Question 4: Does the draft document provide the required level of clarity to explain which types of development will be expected to make planning obligations ?
      • Representations made against Question 5: Is it clear to you how the Council will seek obligations based on specific amounts per dwelling to support relevant community infrastructure from appropriate sites?
      • Representations made against Question 6: What other matters, if any, should be included within this SPD?
      • Representations made against Question 7: Can we simplify and improve the presentation of this SPD, to make it more accessible to people not directly involved in the planning system?
    • Chapter 2: Introduction
    • Chapter 3: Policy Framework and Planning Obligations
    • • Representations made against Question 8: Do you have any comments to make on National Policy and Guidance?
      • Representations made against Question 9: Do you have any comments to make about Local Policy?
    • Chapter 4: Managing Planning Obligations
    • Chapter 5: Guidance on Specific types of obligation
    • Chapter 6: Affordable Housing
    • • Representations made against Question 27: What are your views on Harborough's affordable housing requirements in respect of the percentage sought and the tenure mix. Does this approach meet the housing needs of Harborough residen
      • Representations made against Question 28: Is the formulae for determining off site contributions for affordable housing appropriate, fair and reasonable? If not what approach would you propose?
      • Representations made against Question 29: Do you have any comments to make about Affordable Housing Contributions?
    • Chapter 7: Community Facilities
    • • Representations made against Question 30: Do you have any comments to make about Community Facilities Contributions
    • Chapter 8: Open Space Sport and Recreation Provision
    • • Representations made against Question 31: Do you have any comments about Open Spaces Sport and Recreation Contributions
    • Chapter 9: Public Health
    • • Representations made against Question 32: Do you have any comments to make about Publci Health Contributions?
    • Chapter 10: Community Safety
    • • Representations made against Question 33: D you have any comment to make about Community Safety Contributions?
    • Chapter 11: Sustainable Drainage
    • • Representations made against Question 34: Do you have any comment to make about Sustainable Drainage?
    • Chapter 12: Broadband and Connectivity
    • • Representations made against Question 35: Do you have any comment to make about Broadband and Connectivity?
    • Chapter 13: Leicestershire County Council Services
    • • Representations made against Question 36: Do you have any comment to make about Leicestershire County Council Services?
    • Chapter 14: Appendix 1 - Registered Providers of Social Housing - Contacts
  • Open Spaces Strategy First Stage Issues Consultation
  • Representation search for Open Spaces Strategy First Stage Issues Consultation
  • • Chapter 1 Introduction
    • • Representations made against Question 1: Do you agree with the overall aims of the Open Spaces Strategy and Provision for Open Space, Sport and Recreation: Developer Guidance document?
      • Representations made against 1.4
      • Representations made against 1.5
      • Representations made against 1.8
    • Chapter 2 Background
    • • Representations made against 2.2
      • Representations made against 2.4
      • Representations made against 2.5
      • Representations made against 2.6
      • Representations made against 2.7
      • Representations made against 2.8
      • Representations made against 2.9
      • Representations made against 2.10
    • Chapter 3 Purpose of the current consultation and preparation timetable
    • • Representations made against Question 2: Are there any particular changes to the format or structure of the document that would make them easier to understand and use?
    • Chapter 4 PART 1 : Purpose and format of the Open Spaces Strategy
    • • Representations made against Question 3: Do you have any comments to make on the existing vision for the Open Spaces Strategy and how can this be improved to make it more relevant?
    • Chapter 5 Structure of the Open Space Strategy
    • • Representations made against 5.4 Table 1 Overview of the Proposed Contents of the Open Spaces Strategy for Harborough District
    • Chapter 6 Open Space Typologies
    • • Representations made against 6.1 Intended Outcomes
      • Representations made against 6.2
      • Representations made against 6.4 Table 2
      • Representations made against Question 4: If Civic Spaces are included as a typology what would be the benefits or drawbacks of this approach?
      • Representations made against 6.6 Table 3
      • Representations made against Question 5: Should it be an aspiration of the District Council to provide a series of 'Greenways' for cycling and walking and how could this aspiration be delivered?
      • Representations made against 6.8 Table 4
    • Chapter 7 Aims
    • • Representations made against Question 6: Do you agree with the approach of developing a series of aims for the Open Spaces Strategy?
      • Representations made against Question 7: Do you have comment to make on the draft aims as detailed in Table 5?
      • Representations made against Question 8: Do you agree that a series of simple icons should be used to identify the aims and how they are supported by policy?
    • Chapter 8 Open Space in Harborough District - Background and Benefits of Open Space
    • • Representations made against 8.2
      • Representations made against 8.3
      • Representations made against 8.4
      • Representations made against 8.5
      • Representations made against 8.7
      • Representations made against 8.8
      • Representations made against 8.10
    • Chapter 9 Open Spaces Vision
    • • Representations made against 9.2
      • Representations made against Question 9: In what way should the Open Spaces Strategy vision be updated to ensure it is still relevant?
    • Chapter 10 Open Spaces Audit and Assessment of Need
    • • Representations made against 10.5
      • Representations made against 10.11
      • Representations made against Question 10: Do you consider the minimum provision standards are still relevant, or should they go up or down?
      • Representations made against Question 11: Can you provide evidence for an increase in or decrease in the minimum provision threshold?
      • Representations made against 10.12
      • Representations made against 10.14 Table 7
      • Representations made against Question 12: Do you consider the minimum accessibility standards are still relevant, or should they go up or down?
      • Representations made against Question 13: Can you provide evidence for an increase in or decrease in the minimum accessibility standards threshold?
      • Representations made against 10.16
      • Representations made against Question 14: Do you consider that the quality vision for open space is still relevant? If not, how should it be updated?
      • Representations made against Question 15: Is a single overall quality vision preferred to a quality vision for each typology of open space?
    • Chapter 11 Open Space and Planning Policies
    • • Representations made against 11.4
      • Representations made against 11.7
      • Representations made against 11.8
    • Chapter 12 Achieving the Vision
    • • Representations made against 12.1 Intended Outcomes
      • Representations made against 12.4
      • Representations made against 12.6
      • Representations made against Question 16: Do you consider that a differential approach should be taken to settlements?
      • Representations made against Question 17: Do you consider that a differing approach should be taken between urban and rural areas, or should a more tailored approach be taken to recognise the settlement hierarchy?
      • Representations made against Question 18: For what reasons have you given your above answers?
      • Representations made against Question 19: How should the priorities of communities be recognised if they want to support an existing facility through contributions from development?
      • Representations made against Question 20: Do you consider that the District Council should routinely adopt open spaces on new development?
      • Representations made against Question 21: What reasons do you have for your answer concerning adoption of open space above?
      • Representations made against Question 22: If the District Council does not routinely adopt open space, what other mechanisms should be used to ensure that open space is maintained satisfactorily in perpetuity?
    • Chapter 13 The Way Forward - Strategy Implementation
    • • Representations made against 13.3
      • Representations made against 13.6
      • Representations made against Question 23: Do you consider that a the District Council should protect and maintain open space at all costs?
      • Representations made against Question 24: Should a more flexible approach be adopted to allow the District Council to dispose of assets if a surplus of open space has been identified?
      • Representations made against Question 25: Should the District Council seek to dispose of open space assets to communities to reduce the Authorities responsibilities for maintenance?
      • Representations made against Question 26: Should sponsorship of open spaces be included as part of the open spaces strategy?
      • Representations made against 13.9
      • Representations made against Question 27: How can external funding opportunities be maximised by the Council?
      • Representations made against 13.13
    • Chapter 14 Monitoring and Review
    • • Representations made against 14.4
      • Representations made against Question 28: Do you have further comments to make with regard to monitoring the delivery of the Open Spaces Strategy?
    • Chapter 15 Policies and Proposals for Open Space Typologies
    • • Representations made against 15.1 Intended Outcomes
      • Representations made against Question 29: Do you consider that the draft aims are appropriate to deliver the Corporate Priorities in terms of open space provision?
    • Chapter 16 PART 2: Purpose and format of the Provision for Open Space Sport and Recreation: Developer Guidance document
    • • Representations made against 16.2
      • Representations made against 16.6 Diagram 2
    • Chapter 17 Structure of the First Stage Issues Consultation Document 40
    • • Representations made against 17.2 Table 9
    • Chapter 18 Introduction for Open Space Sport and Recreation
    • • Representations made against Question 30: Do you agree that the draft aims of the Provision for Open Space Sport and Recreation document are appropriate?
    • Chapter 19 Methodology of Assessment
    • • Representations made against 19.4 Table 10
      • Representations made against Question 31: Do you consider the minimum accessibility standards are still relevant, or should they go up or down?
      • Representations made against Question 32: Can you provide evidence for an increase in or decrease in the minimum accessibility standards threshold?
      • Representations made against 19.7 Table 11
      • Representations made against Question 33: Do you consider the minimum provision standards are still relevant, or should they go up or down?
      • Representations made against Question 34: Can you provide evidence for an increase in or decrease in the minimum provision threshold?
      • Representations made against 19.10
      • Representations made against Question 35: Do you believe that the quality vision for open space is still relevant?
      • Representations made against Question 36: Is a single overall quality vision preferred to a quality vision for each typology of open space?
      • Representations made against 19.12
      • Representations made against 19.14
    • Chapter 20 Open Space Provision Calculations
    • • Representations made against Question 37: Do you believe that the threshold for application of contributions for developments of 10 dwellings or more is still relevant?
      • Representations made against Question 38: Do you believe the threshold for application of contributions from development should change?
      • Representations made against 20.4
      • Representations made against 20.5 Table 12
    • Chapter 21 Operation of the Guidance
    • • Representations made against Question 40: Are the assumed numbers of persons per new dwelling in table 13 still relevant?
      • Representations made against Question 41: Is an average number of persons per dwelling of 2.3 still relevant?
      • Representations made against Question 42: Should the amount of open space required from any development be adjusted in line with the settlement hierarchy in the Local Plan?
      • Representations made against Question 43: Do you consider that communities should be able to determine whether a particular type of open space is required as a priority over others?
      • Representations made against Question 44: How could prioritisation of open space be implemented?
    • Chapter 22 Determining Open Space Contributions including towards Quality of Open Space
    • • Representations made against Question 45: Do you consider that the quality vision for open space is still relevant?
      • Representations made against 22.4
      • Representations made against 22.5
      • Representations made against 22.6
      • Representations made against 22.7
      • Representations made against Question 47: Should the District Council always seek to provide open space on site, or are there occasions when off site contributions are acceptable?
      • Representations made against Question 48: In your opinion where, geographically, should off site contributions from a development be spent
      • Representations made against 22.14
      • Representations made against 22.15
      • Representations made against Question 49: The current commuted sum maintenance period is 15 years. Do you consider that this should be extended or reduced?
      • Representations made against Question 50: Do you consider that District Council contract figures should be used to calculate maintenance costs or an industry recognised index such as Spons Guide?
    • Chapter 23 Securing Open Space Contributions
    • • Representations made against Question 52: Should communities take a greater role in managing and maintaining new open space in the future?
      • Representations made against Question 53: Should commuted sums for maintenance be transferred directly to communities or by instalments annually?
      • Representations made against Question 54: Should the developer be obliged to provide a landscape maintenance plan for the on site open space?
      • Representations made against Question 55: Is this sufficient assurance that the on site open space will be adequately maintained?
      • Representations made against Question 56: How will developer or management company maintained open space be monitored in the future?
      • Representations made against Question 57: How will none compliance with a landscape management plan be rectified and enforced?
      • Representations made against Question 58: In your opinion who is best placed to make the decision about future management and adoption of new open space?
      • Representations made against 23.6
      • Representations made against Question 62: What do you consider would be a reasonable length of time for off site contributions for open space to be spent by communities?
    • Chapter 24 Appendices
    • Chapter 25 Glossary of Terms
  • Consultation draft Statement of Community Involvement
  • Representation search for Consultation draft Statement of Community Involvement
  • • Introduction
    • Democratic Process
    • Why We Consult
    • Who we Consult
    • When Will We Consult
    • How we consult
    • • Representations made against Question 2
      • Representations made against Question 3
      • Representations made against Media
      • Representations made against Question 4
      • Representations made against Parish Councils and Parish Meetings
    • How to Engage with the Planning process
    • • Representations made against How to Comment
      • Representations made against How We Will Respond to Comments
    • Sustainability Appraisals
    • Planning Applications
    • • Representations made against The Pre Application Stage
      • Representations made against The Planning Application Stage
      • Representations made against Appeals
    • Review and Monitoring
    • How to Respond to this Consultation
    • Appendix A - Consultation Bodies
    • Appendix B - Glossary
• Adopted documents
• • Shearsby Conservation Area Appraisal and Management Plan 2021
  • Representation search for Shearsby Conservation Area Appraisal and Management Plan 2021
  • • 1.0 Summary of Special Interest
    • 2.0 Introduction
    • 3.0 Policy and Legislation
    • 4.0 Living and Working in a Conservation Area
    • 5.0 Character Location and Uses
    • 6.0 Definition of Special Interest
    • 7.0 Historic Development of the Area
    • 8.0 Assessment of Special Interest
    • 9.0 Opportunities for Enhancement
    • 10.0 Management Plan
    • • Representations made against Do you have any further comments?
    • 11.0 Council Contact Details
    • Appendix A: Listed Buildings and Scheduled Monuments
  • Harborough Local Plan 2011 to 2031
  • Representation search for Harborough Local Plan 2011 to 2031