Question 2

Showing comments and forms 1 to 3 of 3

Yes

Planning Obligations SPD 2021

Representation ID: 8311

Received: 05/12/2021

Respondent: Mr Peter Jones

Representation Summary:

By improved granularity of "cause" it will be easier to achieve improved consistency of any valuation /award in different communities or developments.

Yes

Planning Obligations SPD 2021

Representation ID: 8315

Received: 10/12/2021

Respondent: Taylor Wimpey UK Limited

Agent: Boyer Planning Ltd

Representation Summary:

Flexibility is required within the wording of the SPD to account for viability assessments.

Yes

Planning Obligations SPD 2021

Representation ID: 8344

Received: 17/12/2021

Respondent: LUTTERWORTH TOWN COUNCIL Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Yes. We understand the rules around the justification however are not necessarily clear as to whether or not they are always applied. The rules around justification would usually limit the content of an S106 agreement, in that they have to comply with the three CIL tests. However, we have experience where money is included within an S106 agreement that is of no use to the community whatsoever, while at the same time money that is needed as a direct result of the development is completely excluded from the agreement.