Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission
Search representations
Results for Environment Agency search
New searchSupport
Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission
GI5 clause 1
Representation ID: 6773
Received: 16/11/2017
Respondent: Environment Agency
Whilst the Environment Agency is in support of Policy GI5, we would question whether bullet-points 3 - 6 in the Policy are correctly labelled or whether they are in fact sub-points of bullet-point 2 (and therefore should be roman numerals). This may have a knock-on effect of subsequent bullet-point labelling in the Policy.
Whilst the Environment Agency is in support of Policy GI5, we would question whether bullet-points 3 - 6 in the Policy are correctly labelled or whether they are in fact sub-points of bullet-point 2 (and therefore should be roman numerals). This may have a knock-on effect of subsequent bullet-point labelling in the Policy.
Support
Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission
GI5 clause 3
Representation ID: 6777
Received: 16/11/2017
Respondent: Environment Agency
Whilst the Environment Agency is in support of Policy GI5, we would question whether bullet-points 3 - 6 in the Policy are correctly labelled or whether they are in fact sub-points of bullet-point 2 (and therefore should be roman numerals). This may have a knock-on effect of subsequent bullet-point labelling in the Policy.
Please see previous comments regarding bullet-point 1, above.
Support
Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission
GI5 clause 4
Representation ID: 6781
Received: 16/11/2017
Respondent: Environment Agency
Whilst the Environment Agency is in support of Policy GI5, we would question whether bullet-points 3 - 6 in the Policy are correctly labelled or whether they are in fact sub-points of bullet-point 2 (and therefore should be roman numerals). This may have a knock-on effect of subsequent bullet-point labelling in the Policy.
Please see previous comments regarding bullet-point 1, above.
Support
Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission
GI5 clause 5
Representation ID: 6782
Received: 16/11/2017
Respondent: Environment Agency
Whilst the Environment Agency is in support of Policy GI5, we would question whether bullet-points 3 - 6 in the Policy are correctly labelled or whether they are in fact sub-points of bullet-point 2 (and therefore should be roman numerals). This may have a knock-on effect of subsequent bullet-point labelling in the Policy.
Please see previous comments regarding clause 1, above.
Support
Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission
GI5 clause 6
Representation ID: 6784
Received: 16/11/2017
Respondent: Environment Agency
Whilst the Environment Agency is in support of Policy GI5, we would question whether bullet-point 3 - 6 in the Policy are correctly labelled or whether they are in fact sub-points of bullet-point 2 (and therefore should be roman numerals). This may have a knock-on effect of subsequent bullet-point labelling in the Policy.
Please see previous comments regarding clause 1, above.
Support
Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission
9.9.7 Explanation
Representation ID: 6797
Received: 16/11/2017
Respondent: Environment Agency
The Environment Agency look forward to continuing to work with the Local Planning Authority and other professional partners in identifying key opportunity areas for the improvement of biodiversity value.
The Environment Agency look forward to continuing to work with the Local Planning Authority and other professional partners in identifying key opportunity areas for the improvement of biodiversity value.
Support
Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission
Key issue 6: Climate change
Representation ID: 6809
Received: 16/11/2017
Respondent: Environment Agency
The Environment Agency welcomes the inclusion of, and wording of Key issue 6.
The Environment Agency welcomes the inclusion of, and wording of Key issue 6.
Support
Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission
Objective 11. Flood risk
Representation ID: 6810
Received: 17/11/2017
Respondent: Environment Agency
The Environment Agency supports the content of Objective 11 since it is in general conformity with the requirements of the NPPF.
The Environment Agency supports the content of Objective 11 since it is in general conformity with the requirements of the NPPF.
Support
Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission
CC3 clause 1
Representation ID: 6812
Received: 16/11/2017
Respondent: Environment Agency
The Environment Agency supports the content of CC3, clause 1 in the respect that it emphasises the need for the Sequential Test to steer new development to the areas at least flood risk, and also for the effects of climate change to be taken into account during the decision making process.
The Environment Agency supports the content of CC3, clause 1 in the respect that it emphasises the need for the Sequential Test to steer new development to the areas at least flood risk, and also for the effects of climate change to be taken into account during the decision making process.
Support
Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission
CC3 2a.
Representation ID: 6816
Received: 16/11/2017
Respondent: Environment Agency
Whilst noting that clause 2 'b' includes the need for flood resilience measures to allow for increased risk due to climate change, we suggest that the wording of clause 'a' be extended to also include the need for resilience measures. This would reinforce an important issue which a Flood Risk Assessment should address.
Whilst noting that clause 2 'b' includes the need for flood resilience measures to allow for increased risk due to climate change, we suggest that the wording of clause 'a' be extended to also include the need for resilience measures. This would reinforce an important issue which a Flood Risk Assessment should address.
