Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

Search representations

Results for Environment Agency search

New search New search

Support

Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

GI5 clause 1

Representation ID: 6773

Received: 16/11/2017

Respondent: Environment Agency

Representation Summary:

Whilst the Environment Agency is in support of Policy GI5, we would question whether bullet-points 3 - 6 in the Policy are correctly labelled or whether they are in fact sub-points of bullet-point 2 (and therefore should be roman numerals). This may have a knock-on effect of subsequent bullet-point labelling in the Policy.

Full text:

Whilst the Environment Agency is in support of Policy GI5, we would question whether bullet-points 3 - 6 in the Policy are correctly labelled or whether they are in fact sub-points of bullet-point 2 (and therefore should be roman numerals). This may have a knock-on effect of subsequent bullet-point labelling in the Policy.

Support

Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

GI5 clause 3

Representation ID: 6777

Received: 16/11/2017

Respondent: Environment Agency

Representation Summary:

Whilst the Environment Agency is in support of Policy GI5, we would question whether bullet-points 3 - 6 in the Policy are correctly labelled or whether they are in fact sub-points of bullet-point 2 (and therefore should be roman numerals). This may have a knock-on effect of subsequent bullet-point labelling in the Policy.

Full text:

Please see previous comments regarding bullet-point 1, above.

Support

Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

GI5 clause 4

Representation ID: 6781

Received: 16/11/2017

Respondent: Environment Agency

Representation Summary:

Whilst the Environment Agency is in support of Policy GI5, we would question whether bullet-points 3 - 6 in the Policy are correctly labelled or whether they are in fact sub-points of bullet-point 2 (and therefore should be roman numerals). This may have a knock-on effect of subsequent bullet-point labelling in the Policy.

Full text:

Please see previous comments regarding bullet-point 1, above.

Support

Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

GI5 clause 5

Representation ID: 6782

Received: 16/11/2017

Respondent: Environment Agency

Representation Summary:

Whilst the Environment Agency is in support of Policy GI5, we would question whether bullet-points 3 - 6 in the Policy are correctly labelled or whether they are in fact sub-points of bullet-point 2 (and therefore should be roman numerals). This may have a knock-on effect of subsequent bullet-point labelling in the Policy.

Full text:

Please see previous comments regarding clause 1, above.

Support

Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

GI5 clause 6

Representation ID: 6784

Received: 16/11/2017

Respondent: Environment Agency

Representation Summary:

Whilst the Environment Agency is in support of Policy GI5, we would question whether bullet-point 3 - 6 in the Policy are correctly labelled or whether they are in fact sub-points of bullet-point 2 (and therefore should be roman numerals). This may have a knock-on effect of subsequent bullet-point labelling in the Policy.

Full text:

Please see previous comments regarding clause 1, above.

Support

Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

9.9.7 Explanation

Representation ID: 6797

Received: 16/11/2017

Respondent: Environment Agency

Representation Summary:

The Environment Agency look forward to continuing to work with the Local Planning Authority and other professional partners in identifying key opportunity areas for the improvement of biodiversity value.

Full text:

The Environment Agency look forward to continuing to work with the Local Planning Authority and other professional partners in identifying key opportunity areas for the improvement of biodiversity value.

Support

Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

Key issue 6: Climate change

Representation ID: 6809

Received: 16/11/2017

Respondent: Environment Agency

Representation Summary:

The Environment Agency welcomes the inclusion of, and wording of Key issue 6.

Full text:

The Environment Agency welcomes the inclusion of, and wording of Key issue 6.

Support

Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

Objective 11. Flood risk

Representation ID: 6810

Received: 17/11/2017

Respondent: Environment Agency

Representation Summary:

The Environment Agency supports the content of Objective 11 since it is in general conformity with the requirements of the NPPF.

Full text:

The Environment Agency supports the content of Objective 11 since it is in general conformity with the requirements of the NPPF.

Support

Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

CC3 clause 1

Representation ID: 6812

Received: 16/11/2017

Respondent: Environment Agency

Representation Summary:

The Environment Agency supports the content of CC3, clause 1 in the respect that it emphasises the need for the Sequential Test to steer new development to the areas at least flood risk, and also for the effects of climate change to be taken into account during the decision making process.

Full text:

The Environment Agency supports the content of CC3, clause 1 in the respect that it emphasises the need for the Sequential Test to steer new development to the areas at least flood risk, and also for the effects of climate change to be taken into account during the decision making process.

Support

Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

CC3 2a.

Representation ID: 6816

Received: 16/11/2017

Respondent: Environment Agency

Representation Summary:

Whilst noting that clause 2 'b' includes the need for flood resilience measures to allow for increased risk due to climate change, we suggest that the wording of clause 'a' be extended to also include the need for resilience measures. This would reinforce an important issue which a Flood Risk Assessment should address.

Full text:

Whilst noting that clause 2 'b' includes the need for flood resilience measures to allow for increased risk due to climate change, we suggest that the wording of clause 'a' be extended to also include the need for resilience measures. This would reinforce an important issue which a Flood Risk Assessment should address.

If you are having trouble using the system, please try our help guide.