Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission
Search representations
Results for LUBENHAM Parish Council search
New searchObject
Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission
IN3 Clause 2
Representation ID: 6263
Received: 03/11/2017
Respondent: LUBENHAM Parish Council
Legally compliant? No
Sound? Yes
Duty to co-operate? Yes
This should not be restricted to one network provider - there should be a choice for subsequent users.
This should not be restricted to one network provider - there should be a choice for subsequent users.
Object
Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission
IN4 1c.
Representation ID: 6265
Received: 03/11/2017
Respondent: LUBENHAM Parish Council
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? Yes
Duty to co-operate? Yes
agree but add as below
agree but add as below
Object
Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission
MH1 1f.
Representation ID: 6270
Received: 03/11/2017
Respondent: LUBENHAM Parish Council
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Yes
As far as we are aware the MH Transport Strategy has not yet been published since the consultation phase and therefore how can residents comment on policies relating to a document that we have yet to see. While the prospect of a financial contribution is supported - we would like to know what measures it may provide.
As far as we are aware the MH Transport Strategy has not yet been published since the consultation phase and therefore how can residents comment on policies relating to a document that we have yet to see. While the prospect of a financial contribution is supported - we would like to know what measures it may provide.
Object
Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission
MH2 1e.
Representation ID: 6271
Received: 03/11/2017
Respondent: LUBENHAM Parish Council
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Yes
As far as we area aware the MH Transport Strategy has not yet been published since the consultation phase and therefore how can residents comment on policies relating to a document that we have yet to see. While the prospect of a financial contribution is supported we would like to know what measures it may provide.
As for MH2
Object
Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission
MH4 1d.
Representation ID: 6273
Received: 03/11/2017
Respondent: LUBENHAM Parish Council
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Yes
We do not yet know what the MH transport strategy includes
We do not yet know what the MH transport strategy includes
Object
Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission
MH4 1d.
Representation ID: 6275
Received: 03/11/2017
Respondent: LUBENHAM Parish Council
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? Yes
Duty to co-operate? Yes
This area is in Lubenham Parish and traffic will be likely to use the new link road through the SDA and /or the Foxton Road
Add financial contribution to mitigate any likely impacts of increased traffic on the Road system in Lubenham Parish including A4304 and Foxton Road (weight restricted)
This area is in Lubenham Parish and traffic will be likely to use the new link road through the SDA and /or the Foxton Road
Add financial contribution to mitigate any likely impacts of increased traffic on the Road system in Lubenham Parish including A4304 and Foxton Road (weight restricted)
Object
Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission
RT1 3a.iv.
Representation ID: 6393
Received: 03/11/2017
Respondent: LUBENHAM Parish Council
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Yes
Commons car park is an important car park for those travelling from the west who wish to use the town centre. Car parking should be maintained on this site or very close by, as it also provides essential car parking that is accessible to the much used Doctors surgery that is close by. We do not yet know the results of the transport strategy and the implications that this may have for access to the Town Centre if proposals to make Abbey Street one way outbound are included, the Commons Car Park is even more important for local residents
Commons car park is an important car park for those travelling from the west who wish to use the town centre. Car parking should be maintained on this site or very close by, as it also provides essential car parking that is accessible to the much used Doctors surgery that is close by. We do not yet know the results of the transport strategy and the implications that this may have for access to the Town Centre if proposals to make Abbey Street one way outbound are included, the Commons Car Park is even more important for local residents
Object
Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission
4.11 GD6 Explanation
Representation ID: 7193
Received: 17/11/2017
Respondent: LUBENHAM Parish Council
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
The Lubenham Separation area should be afforded the same priority as the Great Bowden separation area - both villages are adjacent to Market Harborough.Residents have expressed their views through the Lubenham Neighbourhood Plan and therefore it should be included in the Policy above
The Lubenham Separation area should be afforded the same priority as the Great Bowden separation area - both villages are adjacent to Market Harborough.Residents have expressed their views through the Lubenham Neighbourhood Plan and therefore it should be included in the Policy above
Object
Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission
GD6 clause 1b
Representation ID: 7196
Received: 17/11/2017
Respondent: LUBENHAM Parish Council
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Include a further item to include Lubenham to Market Harborough Separation area as designated in the made Neighbourhood Plan
Include a further item to include Lubenham to Market Harborough Separation area as designated in the made Neighbourhood Plan
Object
Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission
GD2 clause 1
Representation ID: 7205
Received: 17/11/2017
Respondent: LUBENHAM Parish Council
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
This ridicules the allocation of sites through Neighbourhood Planning and seems to offer any sites around a selected rural village as potential for building. Where sites have been allocated in Neighbourhood Plans including reserve sites there should be no open invitation to develop further.
This ridicules the allocation of sites through Neighbourhood Planning and seems to offer any sites around a selected rural village as potential for building. Where sites have been allocated in Neighbourhood Plans including reserve sites there should be no open invitation to develop further.