GD1 clause 2.

Showing comments and forms 1 to 2 of 2

Object

Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 5963

Received: 01/11/2017

Respondent: Mrs N Stanley

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? Yes

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

Planning applications on sites allocated in the local plan should not be rushed through without due diligence. In particular the Burnmill Farm site, full ecological, archeological, flood risk assessments and consideration of existing residents should be taken into account. On paper, the site may appear to be sustainable but in reality there are many issues that need to be addressed. Localised flooding, problems with access in the winter (inability to access the higher end of Kingston Way), evidence of Great Crested Newts and other protected species and issues to access of the farm e.g. Delivery vehicles.

Full text:

Planning applications on sites allocated in the local plan should not be rushed through without due diligence. In particular the Burnmill Farm site, full ecological, archeological, flood risk assessments and consideration of existing residents should be taken into account. On paper, the site may appear to be sustainable but in reality there are many issues that need to be addressed. Localised flooding, problems with access in the winter (inability to access the higher end of Kingston Way), evidence of Great Crested Newts and other protected species and issues to access of the farm e.g. Delivery vehicles.

Object

Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 6056

Received: 03/11/2017

Respondent: LUBENHAM Parish Council

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? Yes

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

Comment rather than objection - Some weight could be given here to Neighbourhood Plans where they exist..

Full text:

Comment rather than objection - Some weight could be given here to Neighbourhood Plans where they exist..