Object
Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission
Representation ID: 6144
Received: 02/11/2017
Respondent: Mr J R Deacon
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Representation Summary:
Why is it necessary to have another G/T site when there is already one in Mere Lane. Why are the majority of G/T sites on the eastern side of the District. They should be spread over the District. Why has HDC included this site when HM Inspector's ruling on Planning Appeal 14/00603/FUL remains unchanged.
Full text:
Why is it necessary to have another G/T site when there is already one in Mere Lane. Why are the majority of G/T sites on the eastern side of the District. They should be spread over the District. Why has HDC included this site when HM Inspector's ruling on Planning Appeal 14/00603/FUL remains unchanged.