Where is the evidence base for 700,000 sq m? Research tells us that Leicestershire will be overprovided with non rail distribution capacity . This figure is simply about enabling approval for 2 existing planning applications but without sound data to support. This is unacceptable for a development with such a dramatic negative impact on the area. Surely a strategic approach , working with near neighbours such as DIRFT where there is rail provision is required? How does this factor in the provision planned around Hinckley? Even Councillors have acknowledged in the public domain that the process in relation to Magna Park planning is likely to be flawed.
This is not sustainable development in that we do not have a robust or viable road infrastructure, no rail facility and air quality is already an issue in Lutterworth. Unemployment in the area is low so the jobs should be sited elsewhere where there is a demonstrable need. Most workers commute by car in to Magna Park so not only will traffic increase through lorries but also personal vehicles. The Midlands Connect Strategy 2017- 30 recognises that the A5 is inadequate but there are no plans for major upgrades during that period around Magna Park. There are many serious accidents at the junctions between Magna Park and the M69 as things stand - how many more lives will be lost or affected if the traffic is allowed to increase by what will be many thousands of additional journeys?
This proposal does not accord with the NPPF requirements in relation to sustainable transport and climate change nor indeed with conserving and enhancing the natural environment - the development is already of a scale that is completely disproportionate and dominates what should be a predominantly rural landscape. We do not have the housing capacity or other services to support a major influx of workers. Enough is enough.