Object
Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission
Representation ID: 5385
Received: 05/10/2017
Respondent: Mr Neil Blackhall
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
1. The proposed development is on green field land.
2. Is not served by a rail terminal (unlike nearby DIRFT).
3. Lutterworth has less than 1% unemployment, so new jobs are not required.
4. Any jobs will be low-skilled and not "reduce the dependence of Harborough's residents on commuting" by creating higher paid jobs.
5. It will destroy the archaeological site of Bittesby.
6. It will destroy footpaths and walking routes for local residents and visitors.
Therefore it is not JUSTIFIED
1. The proposed development is on green field land
2. Is not served by a rail terminal (unlike nearby DIRFT),
3. Lutterworth has less than 1% unemployment, so new jobs are not required
4. Any jobs will be low-skilled and not "reduce the dependence of Harborough's residents on commuting" by creating higher paid jobs
5. It will destroy the archaeological site of Bittesby
6. It will destroy footpaths and walking routes for local residents and visitors
Therefore it is not JUSTIFIED