Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

Search Representations

Results for Cotesbach Parish Council search

New search New search

Object

Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

L1 clause 3

Representation ID: 6350

Received: 02/11/2017

Respondent: Cotesbach Parish Council

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Low carbon design techniques and technologies are not sufficiently being committed to in Policy L1

Full text:

Low carbon design techniques and technologies are not sufficiently being committed to in Policy L1

Object

Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

Key issue 7: Town centres and retail

Representation ID: 6351

Received: 02/11/2017

Respondent: Cotesbach Parish Council

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Not positively prepared and Not justified - Policy L1 or RT1 have not committed to improving Lutterworth town centre retail opportunities. Resources have not been invested into committing retail allocation in Lutterworth, or identifying S016 or other monies to support an enhancement of the town centre.

Full text:

Not positively prepared and Not justified - Policy L1 or RT1 have not committed to improving Lutterworth town centre retail opportunities. Resources have not been invested into committing retail allocation in Lutterworth, or identifying S016 or other monies to support an enhancement of the town centre.

Object

Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

4.3 GD2 Explanation

Representation ID: 6353

Received: 02/11/2017

Respondent: Cotesbach Parish Council

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Regarding paragraph 4.3.3, the Lutterworth SDA cannot be considered a sustainable development and meeting NPPF guidelines. There is not evidence to highlight the risk of splitting Lutterworth into two through the M1 causing a divided community, therefore the Policy L1 is not congruent with NPPF. Focus needs to be on improvement of the town centre to demonstrate that the vitality of rural communities can be enabled. The Sustainability Assessment 2015 highlights the significant distance from rail infrastructure.

Full text:

Regarding paragraph 4.3.3, the Lutterworth SDA cannot be considered a sustainable development and meeting NPPF guidelines. There is not evidence to highlight the risk of splitting Lutterworth into two through the M1 causing a divided community, therefore the Policy L1 is not congruent with NPPF. Focus needs to be on improvement of the town centre to demonstrate that the vitality of rural communities can be enabled. The Sustainability Assessment 2015 highlights the significant distance from rail infrastructure.

Object

Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

H6 3a.

Representation ID: 6354

Received: 02/11/2017

Respondent: Cotesbach Parish Council

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Not Justified - better consideration needs to be given to the access of the Moorbarns Lane site with it being so close to the school and residential area
A site appears to already have been identified without planning permission granted or material considerations given

Full text:

Not Justified - better consideration needs to be given to the access of the Moorbarns Lane site with it being so close to the school and residential area
A site appears to already have been identified without planning permission granted or material considerations given

Object

Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

BE1 1b.i. 10 hectares B1 & B2 uses in Lutterworth East SDA

Representation ID: 6355

Received: 02/11/2017

Respondent: Cotesbach Parish Council

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Not positively prepared as the Local Plan itself (para 6.1.9) recognises allocation of BE1 above the suggested HEDNA figure, it recognises the land as Grade 2 high agricultural quality (para 15.2.11 in LE1) and was previously consulted upon as a Motorway Service Station, but now there is no requirement for this due to an active planning application less than 4 miles away. This reinforces the lack of required need.

Full text:

Not positively prepared as the Local Plan itself (para 6.1.9) recognises allocation of BE1 above the suggested HEDNA figure, it recognises the land as Grade 2 high agricultural quality (para 15.2.11 in LE1) and was previously consulted upon as a Motorway Service Station, but now there is no requirement for this due to an active planning application less than 4 miles away. This reinforces the lack of required need.

Support

Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

BE2 2e.

Representation ID: 6356

Received: 02/11/2017

Respondent: Cotesbach Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Fundamental infrastructure problems along the A5, A426, Gibbets Roundabout, Whittle Roundabout and other junctions exist. The current applications that Policy BE2 is clearly based upon do not properly address this policy BE2 (1)e.

Full text:

Fundamental infrastructure problems along the A5, A426, Gibbets Roundabout, Whittle Roundabout and other junctions exist. The current applications that Policy BE2 is clearly based upon do not properly address this policy BE2 (1)e.

Object

Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

BE2 2a.

Representation ID: 6358

Received: 02/11/2017

Respondent: Cotesbach Parish Council

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

There is no evidence of the process that the call for sites has lead to the figures outlined here and in the suggested location. It has not been a transparent process since the consultation in 2015 and the location and allocation is clearly based on 2 existing applications that are due for decision before this Local Plan will be approved.

Full text:

There is no evidence of the process that the call for sites has lead to the figures outlined here and in the suggested location. It has not been a transparent process since the consultation in 2015 and the location and allocation is clearly based on 2 existing applications that are due for decision before this Local Plan will be approved.

Object

Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

L1 clause 2

Representation ID: 6359

Received: 02/11/2017

Respondent: Cotesbach Parish Council

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Not positively prepared as this policy has not considered how the potential benefits of the SDA could be used to enhance Lutterworth Town, for example specific allocations or Retail land.

Full text:

Not positively prepared as this policy has not considered how the potential benefits of the SDA could be used to enhance Lutterworth Town, for example specific allocations or Retail land.

Object

Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

L1 3m.

Representation ID: 6360

Received: 02/11/2017

Respondent: Cotesbach Parish Council

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

The "spine road" needs to be fit for purpose, i.e enable Town Centre traffic reduction, and be committed to earlier than 1,250 dwellings - this will be almost when the development is complete and traffic levels are too high.

Full text:

The "spine road" needs to be fit for purpose, i.e enable Town Centre traffic reduction, and be committed to earlier than 1,250 dwellings - this will be almost when the development is complete and traffic levels are too high.

Object

Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

L1 3q.

Representation ID: 6361

Received: 02/11/2017

Respondent: Cotesbach Parish Council

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

This needs to include a regular bus service to local train stations as currently Lutterworth is highly dependent on the road network. The 2015 Sustainability Assessment recognised a risk with the Lutterworth SDA being so far from a train station, but this has not been addressed within the Local Plan.

Full text:

This needs to include a regular bus service to local train stations as currently Lutterworth is highly dependent on the road network. The 2015 Sustainability Assessment recognised a risk with the Lutterworth SDA being so far from a train station, but this has not been addressed within the Local Plan.

If you are having trouble using the system, please try our help guide.