Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

Search representations

Results for TUR LANGTON Parish Council search

New search New search

Object

Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

GD3 clause 1

Representation ID: 5863

Received: 31/10/2017

Respondent: TUR LANGTON Parish Council

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? Yes

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

This is very open to abuse. This policy states that all of these forms of development WILL be permitted. There are no control measures to limit any attempted abuse. The explanation states that these are the types of developments "in appropriate circumstances" but gives no guidance on what these circumstances are.

Full text:

This is very open to abuse. This policy states that all of these forms of development WILL be permitted. There are no control measures to limit any attempted abuse. The explanation states that these are the types of developments "in appropriate circumstances" but gives no guidance on what these circumstances are.

Object

Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

GD4 clause 1b

Representation ID: 5864

Received: 31/10/2017

Respondent: TUR LANGTON Parish Council

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? Yes

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

The control measure in para b7 would need to be strictly applied ie if a house is built to serve a supposed need, then if this need does not exist later (i.e. if the house is placed on the open market) then it should be removed. Our fear is that the enforcement officer would not be able to enforce this against a determined developer.

Full text:

The control measure in para b7 would need to be strictly applied ie if a house is built to serve a supposed need, then if this need does not exist later (i.e. if the house is placed on the open market) then it should be removed. Our fear is that the enforcement officer would not be able to enforce this against a determined developer.

Object

Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

GD4 clause 1c

Representation ID: 5865

Received: 31/10/2017

Respondent: TUR LANGTON Parish Council

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? Yes

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

This is a reapplication of the exceptional design clause in PPS7. In the past, it has been used to justify large and obtrusive houses in very prominent locations, aiming to provide housing at the very top end of the housing market, which is not consistent with the aims outlined in the explanation. This does/will attract very determined developers because of the high returns available. Innovation and exceptional quality are very loosely defined and subjective criteria.

Full text:

This is a reapplication of the exceptional design clause in PPS7. In the past, it has been used to justify large and obtrusive houses in very prominent locations, aiming to provide housing at the very top end of the housing market, which is not consistent with the aims outlined in the explanation. This does/will attract very determined developers because of the high returns available. Innovation and exceptional quality are very loosely defined and subjective criteria.

Object

Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

H3 clause 1

Representation ID: 5872

Received: 31/10/2017

Respondent: TUR LANGTON Parish Council

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? Yes

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

Reference should be made here to the NP.

Full text:

Reference should be made here to the NP.

Object

Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

Objective 14: Neighbourhood Planning

Representation ID: 7382

Received: 31/10/2017

Respondent: TUR LANGTON Parish Council

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

The general hierarchy of the LP and NP needs to be more clear at para. 1.6. The LP gives an overview of the policies, but if the NP aims to control a particular aspect of development that the LP is in favour of, the mechanism for how this is applied should be clarified. i.e. Any restrictions that the NP aims to apply will be based on evidence, and reviewed by the planning authority, which is more focussed and relevant than the general policies in the LP.

Full text:

The general hierarchy of the LP and NP needs to be more clear at para. 1.6. The LP gives an overview of the policies, but if the NP aims to control a particular aspect of development that the LP is in favour of, the mechanism for how this is applied should be clarified. i.e. Any restrictions that the NP aims to apply will be based on evidence, and reviewed by the planning authority, which is more focussed and relevant than the general policies in the LP.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.