Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission
Search representations
Results for Age Concern Lutterworth And District search
New searchObject
Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission
L1 3k.
Representation ID: 5845
Received: 30/10/2017
Respondent: Age Concern Lutterworth And District
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Our swimming pool / leisure centre has been available to the immediate town for over 50 years, I totally disagree to the Leisure centre being Re built out of the immediate town, many of our older residents using the facilities would be unable to get to the new centre if relocated, the same would be for mums that don't drive taking their children for swimming lessons.
Our swimming pool / leisure centre has been available to the immediate town for over 50 years, I totally disagree to the Leisure centre being Re built out of the immediate town, many of our older residents using the facilities would be unable to get to the new centre if relocated, the same would be for mums that don't drive taking their children for swimming lessons.
Object
Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission
L1 3a.
Representation ID: 5847
Received: 30/10/2017
Respondent: Age Concern Lutterworth And District
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
This planned development is way too big, far too many houses bringing cars which will greatly impact on all surrounding roads and connecting villages / towns. Our roads are already becoming grid locked at certain times of the day, noise pollution, air pollution will greatly increase. This will cause more health problems as a result.
This planned development is way too big, far too many houses bringing cars which will greatly impact on all surrounding roads and connecting villages / towns. Our roads are already becoming grid locked at certain times of the day, noise pollution, air pollution will greatly increase. This will cause more health problems as a result.
Object
Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission
BE2 clause 2
Representation ID: 5849
Received: 30/10/2017
Respondent: Age Concern Lutterworth And District
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Magna Park is already too big, we do not need this as we have relatively low unemployment, an increase again on traffic and pollution including light pollution.
Magma Park is already too big, we do not need this as we have Re lately low unemployment, an increase again on traffic and pollution including light pollution.