MH3 1h.

Showing comments and forms 1 to 6 of 6

Object

Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 5405

Received: 26/10/2017

Respondent: Market Harborough Civic Society

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

The Council has not fully researched the possible impact of the new development on the views from the north and from Gt Bowden.It is essential for this appraisal to be done before any land is allocated.

See our Response to H1 ID5377

Full text:

The Council has not fully researched the possible impact of the new development on the views from the north and from Gt Bowden.It is essential for this appraisal to be done before any land is allocated.

See our Response to H1 ID5377

Object

Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 5686

Received: 28/10/2017

Respondent: Mr Michael Major

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Your documents expresses concern about the visual impact on the northern edge but is not at all concerned about the visual and other adverse impacts on the houses on the southern edge

Full text:

Your documents expresses concern about the visual impact on the northern edge but is not at all concerned about the visual and other adverse impacts on the houses on the southern edge

Object

Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 5846

Received: 01/11/2017

Respondent: Mrs N Stanley

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? Yes

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

Having viewed the potential development proposed by David Wilson Homes at a recent exhibition, the design of the development was compact and dense. It appeared not to be open and didn't fit in with its surrounding area. Existing development is wide and open. RIdge height to the farm end should be low as farm buildings are already visible from Leicester Road. It doesn't meet your Objective number 9 - Design, as it doesn't reflect the local area or respect residents amenity.

Full text:

Having viewed the potential development proposed by David Wilson Homes at a recent exhibition, the design of the development was compact and dense. It appeared not to be open and didn't fit in with its surrounding area. Existing development is wide and open. RIdge height to the farm end should be low as farm buildings are already visible from Leicester Road. It doesn't meet your Objective number 9 - Design, as it doesn't reflect the local area or respect residents amenity.

Object

Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 6424

Received: 03/11/2017

Respondent: Mrs Anna Burbidge

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

The proposed site is higher than existing properties and it appears from the plans that the new houses will be built very close to existing properties. It is impossible to see what sort of housing will definitely be built and I feel there is cause for concern that existing properties will find themselves overlooked, which was something David Wilson assured would not happen originally.

Full text:

The proposed site is higher than existing properties and it appears from the plans that the new houses will be built very close to existing properties. It is impossible to see what sort of housing will definitely be built and I feel there is cause for concern that existing properties will find themselves overlooked, which was something David Wilson assured would not happen originally.

Object

Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 7010

Received: 17/11/2017

Respondent: Mr Jamie Buckby

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

The site is unsuitable for development as the ridge height of the houses would affect the views of the houses in Great Bowden. Trees have been planted but they would not obscure the ridge height. In winter, the trees wouldn't have foliage and wouldn't offer a screen to the house, or the ridge view.

Full text:

The site is unsuitable for development as the ridge height of the houses would affect the views of the houses in Great Bowden. Trees have been planted but they would not obscure the ridge height. In winter, the trees wouldn't have foliage and wouldn't offer a screen to the house, or the ridge view.

Object

Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 7203

Received: 17/11/2017

Respondent: Mr Peter Taylor

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? Yes

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

The proposed number of house and the height of their ridge tiles impacts on the view from Kingston Way, Great Bowden and the grand Union Canal.

Full text:

The proposed number of house and the height of their ridge tiles impacts on the view from Kingston Way, Great Bowden and the grand Union Canal.