BE4 2f.

Object

Representation ID: 5432

Received: 27/10/2017

Respondent: Mr Andy Johnson

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? Yes

Duty to co-operate? Yes

There is no public transport in the area and all travel to BPG is by car. There are no other modes of transport and it is fanciful to think that a travel plan could solve the traffic issues that would be created by additional development. Furthermore I doubt that the local authority has the resource to monitor a travel plan and therefore it is likely that the requirements of any such plan would not be adhered to.

Object

Representation ID: 7239

Received: 17/11/2017

Respondent: C Walton Ltd

Agent: Marrons Solicitors

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The site owners welcome any initiative to create public transport access to the site. However, the site is not currently serviced by public transport. The policy is predicated on a non-sequitur (as no public transport services the site) and new development proposals would therefore be inherently conflicted. It is considered that the suggested policy is not sound, because it would potentially undermine proposals for sustainable economic development. It is unjustified and obviated by criteria d and e of the proposed policy, because the impacts arising from any additional development can be assessed.