H6 2a.

Object

Representation ID: 7641

Received: 17/11/2017

Respondent: Mrs Linda Hollingworth

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

There are already enough traveller sites in the local area. The existing sites could be slightly extended to accommodate extra travellers without creating additional sites.

Object

Representation ID: 7645

Received: 17/11/2017

Respondent: mr chris colton

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

This site seems highly unacceptable given that there is currently an extremely large already established site at Mere Lane.
The allowance of this will then be both sides of Ullesthorpe. It seems highly unacceptable to allow another the other side of the village.

I note that there is no plan to expand or place new sites near Market Harborough and surrounding areas. Just Lutterworth and Ullesthorpe areas.

Object

Representation ID: 7654

Received: 17/11/2017

Respondent: Emma Ridley

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

The local area already has two sites, Mere Lane and Woodway Lane. The proposed site will put additional and unnecessary strain on the local facilities that are already struggling to cope. Both Ullesthorpe and Claybrooke Schools are being negatively impacted by the requirements placed on them.