GI4 clause 1
Support
Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission
Representation ID: 5650
Received: 27/10/2017
Respondent: Ms Caroline Pick
CPRE Leicestershire supports this policy
CPRE Leicestershire supports this policy
Object
Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission
Representation ID: 6129
Received: 01/11/2017
Respondent: MR Michael Wilcox
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
There is no green space areas identified within Ullesthorpe
There is no green space areas identified within Ullesthorpe
Support
Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission
Representation ID: 6302
Received: 02/11/2017
Respondent: HUNGARTON Parish Council
The policy map for Hungarton does not show the 4 local green spaces identified and validated through our Neighbourhood Development Plan process. As the plan has now been made these should now be included in the policy map.
The policy map for Hungarton does not show the 4 local green spaces identified and validated through our Neighbourhood Development Plan process. As the plan has now been made these should now be included in the policy map.
Support
Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission
Representation ID: 6549
Received: 02/11/2017
Respondent: Mrs Linda Bryan
Under the new proposal several areas previously designated as "important open space" have had that designation quite rightly removed. They do not serve either the 'public' or any other 'important' function. Planners have recognised inappropriate land designations.
I am writing this regarding the proposed District Plan with specific reference to the Parish of Arnesby. Under the new proposal several areas previously designated as "important open space" have had that designation quite rightly removed. They do not serve either the 'public' or any other 'important' function. However it would appear that the Parish Council are unreasonably committed to preventing any small scale infill building within Arnesby and seem to be pushing to have such designations retained.
Arnesby has become an exclusive village and over the years the lack of affordable housing has driven away those born and bred in the village in my case where generations of my family have lived and worked. Continuing with such restrictions will stifle and limit the community as young and old will be unable to afford to live in what could quite easily become an exclusive commuter estate - with no local amenities. I hope the Planners will be allowed to put through a plan that allows for reasonable infill so that Arnesby can be a family community not just an exclusive housing development.
Support
Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission
Representation ID: 7084
Received: 17/11/2017
Respondent: THURNBY AND BUSHBY Parish Council
Thurnby and Bushby Parish Council supports as sound.
Thurnby and Bushby Parish Council supports as sound.
Object
Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission
Representation ID: 7399
Received: 01/11/2017
Respondent: Wells McFarlane
Agent: Pegasus
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Yes
We object to the designation of a parcel of land to the west of Rugby Road, Lutterworth as a 'Local Green Space ' (as shown on Inset Map: 64 (Lutterworth, Bitteswell and Magna Park)). The designation is not justified and, as such, Policy GI4 is unsound.
We wish to register our objection to Policy GI4. Specifically, we object to the designation of a parcel of land to the west of Rugby Road, Lutterworth as a 'Local Green Space ' (as shown on Inset Map: 64 (Lutterworth, Bitteswell and Magna Park).
In order to assess the validity of the proposed designation of land to the west of Rugby Road, Lutterworth (as part of a wider parcel of proposed Local Green Space), an 'Outline Landscape and Visual Appraisal' has been undertaken. The full report is appended to this letter of representation. In summary, the report concludes that there is very little weight that can be attached to landscape and visual matters that would support the designation of the area as a Local Green Space when considered against the criteria of paragraph 77 of the NPPF.
The designation of land to the west of Rugby Road, Lutterworth is not justified and, as such, Policy GI4 is unsound.
Support
Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission
Representation ID: 7524
Received: 03/11/2017
Respondent: Dr Andrew Moltu
Arnesby is not the chocolate box village the Parish Council like to imply.
There are many areas that could support infill building that have been left unused offering nothing to the outlook or service of the village.
The district plan should facilitate reasonable development and not be used as a blunt tool for those who will object to all development.
I believe trained planners are better skilled to make these decisions than residents with Nimby agenda.
I am writing this in specific reference to the proposed district plan in reference to the Parish of Arnesby.
I have seen the proposal from the planners at Harborough Council which I am broadly in support of. However I am concerned that the Parish Council is seeking to use a local "Referendum" to effectively override the proposed plan and impose a reversion to the existing plan which has a number of anomalously designated land.
Historically significant areas within the village have been subject to the designation of "Important Public Open Space" which, following our discussions with the planning officers are not supportable in legal terms, as that much of the land so designated is neither public, open or serving any important function.
I believe that much of this was imposed in the 1970s as a blunt tool to restrict a proposed major development, however in the current era where such matters are more open to scrutiny it would be legally dubious to try and sustain the designation.
I would hope that the planners will resist the pressure from the Parish Council to revert to the old plan.
The unforeseen impact over the 40 years that the existing plan has been in place has limited the possibility of even small scale building in the village and contributed to the loss of local amenities such as Post Office, Public House, bus service, shops and factories. Indeed the Post Office, shops and factories have been converted or demolished to generate housing.
Maintaining such restrictions will simply continue the negative impact on the village, forcing the young and elderly to leave because many of the areas simply because of the limited housing.
I fear that the Parish Council is being excessively influenced by residents seeking to prevent local building to maintain the exclusivity and thus cost of an Arnesby House.
I grew up in the village but like many was forced to leave for study and work and priced out of returning and seeing the continued unjust imposition of excessively restrictive planning rules would be unfortunate for future generations.