Regulation 19 - Proposed Draft Local Plan Submission

Search representations

Results for Clarendon Land search

New search New search

Object

Regulation 19 - Proposed Draft Local Plan Submission

Policy DS01 Development Strategy: Delivering Homes

Representation ID: 13794

Received: 02/05/2025

Respondent: Clarendon Land

Agent: Marrons

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

We support the HLP’s provision for Leicester’s unmet need but note that this does not apply throughout the Plan period. Beyond 2036. the HLP makes no provision to address potential wider shortfalls within the Housing Market Area (“HMA”)

Change suggested by respondent:

We consider that the following modifications should be considered to ensure the HLP’s soundness.

Firstly, the HLP should contain a clear mechanism for addressing Leicester’s unmet need beyond 2036 should this arise. Whilst an early review policy has been incorporated, the PPG indicates that strategic policy-making authorities should cooperate to address cross-boundary matters and not defer these issues to subsequent reviews. Further land allocations or reserve sites should be identified to address Leicester’s unmet need should it arise in the current Plan period.

Secondly, the HLP and its evidence should consider whether an uplift to the housing requirement could be made, and further suitable, deliverable and sustainable sites allocated, to address the acute need for affordable housing.

Thirdly, the SA should consider a “high growth” scenario across the refined options, consistent with our wider observations in relation to the housing requirement. The SA process should demonstrate that more sustainable settlements are accommodating
housing growth in preference to less sustainable ones.

Fourthly, the approach to the HLP’s supply-side buffer should be re-considered to align with that consulted upon during the issues and options stage. A buffer of around 20% is appropriate.

Full text:

See attachment for full representation document.

Attachments:

Object

Regulation 19 - Proposed Draft Local Plan Submission

Policy IM01: Monitoring and review of the Local Plan

Representation ID: 13796

Received: 02/05/2025

Respondent: Clarendon Land

Agent: Marrons

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

A further matter Policy IM01 should address is the differential between the HLP’s annual average housing requirement (657 dpa) and the more recent local housing need (“LHN”) for Harborough District calculated using the new Standard Method (723 dpa). Given the differential between these figures and the fact that it will widen even more significantly from 2036 onwards, we expect that the Council will be required to progress a review and an update to address the District’s own needs regardless of events within the wider HMA.

Change suggested by respondent:

A further matter Policy IM01 should address is the differential between the HLP’s annual average housing requirement (657 dpa) and the more recent local housing need (“LHN”) for Harborough District calculated using the new Standard Method (723 dpa).

Full text:

See attachment for full representation document.

Attachments:

Object

Regulation 19 - Proposed Draft Local Plan Submission

Policy HN01 Housing Need: Affordable Homes

Representation ID: 13798

Received: 02/05/2025

Respondent: Clarendon Land

Agent: Marrons

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

The HENA identifies a need for affordable homes in Harborough of 421 dpa compared with an annual average requirement for overall housing of 621 dpa. Given that affordable housing can only be viably delivered at 40% based on the HLP and its evidence base, the overall housing requirement will not address the objectively assessed needs for affordable homes. There is no indication within the HLP or its evidence base that the relationship between the overall affordable housing needs and the housing requirement has been considered and an increased housing requirement would clearly facilitate the delivery of more affordable homes overall, which would help to alleviate the District’s significant affordability challenges.

Change suggested by respondent:

HLP should support an uplift in delivery to address the acute need for affordable homes. The decision not to uplift the housing requirement to address affordability concerns in line with the PPG lacks justification.

Full text:

See attachment for full representation document.

Attachments:

Object

Regulation 19 - Proposed Draft Local Plan Submission

4.9

Representation ID: 13804

Received: 02/05/2025

Respondent: Clarendon Land

Agent: Marrons

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

we agree that RO3 (balancing growth between the urban area and the market towns, with a medium level of growth directed towards the large villages) is the optimal approach and endorse the SA’s findings in this regard.

We note that Policy DS01 allocates 350 homes to Small
Villages through settlement specific apportionments to be delivered through neighbourhood plans, with an additional 452 homes directed to Medium Villages. This represents a significant share of growth at the lower end of the settlement hierarchy and must be supported through evidence within the SA.

we agree there remains a clear role for growth across all tiers of the hierarchy.

Full text:

See attachment for full representation document.

Attachments:

Object

Regulation 19 - Proposed Draft Local Plan Submission

4.11

Representation ID: 13811

Received: 02/05/2025

Respondent: Clarendon Land

Agent: Marrons

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Table 2 HLP has a supply buffer over and above the minimum requirement of about 12%.

The HLP appropriately recognises the difficulties of over-reliance on strategic sites and should therefore provide a meaningful contingency of supply from alternative sources

The HLP’s housing trajectory at Appendix 5 should be supported by objective analysis to underpin its assumptions regarding the timing and rate of delivery across all components of housing supply

Given the risks inherent within the spatial strategy, we would expect to see a higher buffer of closer to 20% rather than the 12% proposed. We would therefore encourage HDC to consider a greater supply-side buffer of about 20% in line with the approach suggested in the issues and options consultation.

Change suggested by respondent:

We consider that the following modifications should be considered to ensure the HLP’s soundness.

Firstly, the HLP should contain a clear mechanism for addressing Leicester’s unmet need beyond 2036 should this arise. Whilst an early review policy has been incorporated, the PPG indicates that strategic policy-making authorities should cooperate to address cross boundary matters and not defer these issues to subsequent reviews. Further land allocations or reserve sites should be identified to address Leicester’s unmet need should it arise in the current Plan period.

Secondly, the HLP and its evidence should consider whether an uplift to the housing requirement could be made, and further suitable, deliverable and sustainable sites allocated, to address the acute need for affordable housing.

Thirdly, the SA should consider a “high growth” scenario across the refined options, consistent with our wider observations in relation to the housing requirement. The SA process should demonstrate that more sustainable settlements are accommodating housing growth in preference to less sustainable ones.

Fourthly, the approach to the HLP’s supply-side buffer should be re-considered to align with that consulted upon during the issues and options stage. A buffer of around 20% is appropriate.

Full text:

See attachment for full representation document.

Attachments:

Support

Regulation 19 - Proposed Draft Local Plan Submission

HH1

Representation ID: 13845

Received: 02/05/2025

Respondent: Clarendon Land

Agent: Marrons

Representation Summary:

For the avoidance of doubt, Clarendon Land & Development support the draft allocation

The draft allocation for the site (reference HH1) is for around 80 dwellings. Clarendon Land and Development has submitted a planning application (awaiting registration) , supported by a constraint-led masterplanning exercise, which indicates that up to 90 dwellings are capable of being delivered on site whilst meeting policy requirements for open space and the ambitions for development to occupy the eastern part of the site.

Full text:

See attachment for full representation document.

Attachments:

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.