Planning Obligations SPD 2021

No

Representation ID: 8337

Received: 17/12/2021

Respondent: William Davis

Updates are required to paragraph 3.12, 3.21 and 3.25. Paragraph 3.24 is supported.

No

Representation ID: 8338

Received: 17/12/2021

Respondent: William Davis

The ability to phase payments in Paragraph 4.2 is supported. However, as written, it is considered that this paragraph could give the impression that there will only be two tranches. It is considered that it would read better as follows. “Subsequent tranches would be payable at levels of occupation to be agreed.”

No

Representation ID: 8339

Received: 17/12/2021

Respondent: William Davis

It is considered that the tenure split of affordable housing should make provision for First Homes. It is also considered that a different level or mix of affordable housing should be considered in a wider range of circumstances, not just to make the development viable, including when it will suit the character of the area or achieve more sustainable outcomes.

It should be clarified that Discounted Market Sales form part of the Intermediate tenure type and should be supported as part of the tenure mix include in the SPD.

No

Representation ID: 8340

Received: 17/12/2021

Respondent: William Davis

It is considered that the issue of First Homes should be not be delayed until the next Local Plan and should be addressed in the SPD.

No

Representation ID: 8341

Received: 17/12/2021

Respondent: William Davis

It is noted that the HEDNA is now five years old. Applicants should be able to propose off-site contributions.

No

Representation ID: 8342

Received: 17/12/2021

Respondent: William Davis

The 10% Biodiversity Net Gain requirement in the Environment Act has not yet been commenced. As such there is no requirement in policy or law for site to deliver a 10% Biodiversity Net Gain.