Planning Obligations SPD

Search Representations

Results for BROUGHTON ASTLEY Parish Council search

New search New search

Comment

Planning Obligations SPD

Question 16: Do you have any comments to make about varying planning obligations?

Representation ID: 707

Received: 30/09/2015

Respondent: BROUGHTON ASTLEY Parish Council

Representation Summary:

The Parish Council would welcome formal notification of any variations to planning obligations.

Full text:

The Parish Council would welcome formal notification of any variations to planning obligations.

Comment

Planning Obligations SPD

Question 17: Do you have any comments about monitoring planning obligations?

Representation ID: 708

Received: 30/09/2015

Respondent: BROUGHTON ASTLEY Parish Council

Representation Summary:

The Parish Council would welcome formal notification when such triggers are reached and obligations fulfilled.

Full text:

The Parish Council would welcome formal notification when such triggers are reached and obligations fulfilled.

Comment

Planning Obligations SPD

Question 19: Do you have any comments on pooling?

Representation ID: 709

Received: 30/09/2015

Respondent: BROUGHTON ASTLEY Parish Council

Representation Summary:

The Parish Council believes that pooling is a good idea for major projects.

Full text:

The Parish Council believes that pooling is a good idea for major projects.

Comment

Planning Obligations SPD

Question 22: Do you think the right balance is achieved between market reality and planning objectives? and Harborough's approach to viability generally?

Representation ID: 710

Received: 30/09/2015

Respondent: BROUGHTON ASTLEY Parish Council

Representation Summary:

The Parish Council does not believe that the right balance is currently being achieved, as more starter/smaller homes are required, as opposed to the larger 5/6 bedroom homes that developers are building.

Full text:

The Parish Council does not believe that the right balance is currently being achieved, as more starter/smaller homes are required, as opposed to the larger 5/6 bedroom homes that developers are building.

Comment

Planning Obligations SPD

Question 23: Do you have any other comments on viability?

Representation ID: 711

Received: 30/09/2015

Respondent: BROUGHTON ASTLEY Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Parish Council and local residents views need to be taken into account.

Full text:

Parish Council and local residents views need to be taken into account.

Comment

Planning Obligations SPD

Question 24: Do you have any comments on maintenance of assets secured through planning obligations?

Representation ID: 712

Received: 30/09/2015

Respondent: BROUGHTON ASTLEY Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Parish Council's need to be aware that they may have an obligation for future maintenance.

Full text:

Parish Council's need to be aware that they may have an obligation for future maintenance.

Comment

Planning Obligations SPD

Question 27: What are your views on Harborough's affordable housing requirements in respect of the percentage sought and the tenure mix. Does this approach meet the housing needs of Harborough residen

Representation ID: 713

Received: 30/09/2015

Respondent: BROUGHTON ASTLEY Parish Council

Representation Summary:

The Parish Council strongly agrees with the final sentence of paragraph 6.3.4.

Full text:

The Parish Council strongly agrees with the final sentence of paragraph 6.3.4.

Comment

Planning Obligations SPD

Question 28: Is the formulae for determining off site contributions for affordable housing appropriate, fair and reasonable? If not what approach would you propose?

Representation ID: 714

Received: 30/09/2015

Respondent: BROUGHTON ASTLEY Parish Council

Representation Summary:

The Parish Council believes the formulae is not unfair; however; it would encourage more affordable houses to be built if the percentage commuted sum was reduced dependent on the need for the area.

Full text:

The Parish Council believes the formulae is not unfair; however; it would encourage more affordable houses to be built if the percentage commuted sum was reduced dependent on the need for the area.

Comment

Planning Obligations SPD

Question 35: Do you have any comment to make about Broadband and Connectivity?

Representation ID: 715

Received: 30/09/2015

Respondent: BROUGHTON ASTLEY Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Broadband and connectivity should be a standard provision in all new housing.

Full text:

Broadband and connectivity should be a standard provision in all new housing.

If you are having trouble using the system, please try our help guide.