GD8 1.e.i.

Object

Representation ID: 5874

Received: 31/10/2017

Respondent: Mr Paul Henry

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

The proposed development at site MH3 by reason of its size, depth, width, height and massing would have an unacceptably adverse impact on the amenities of the properties immediately adjacent to the site and the surrounding area by reason of overlooking, loss of privacy and visually overbearing impact. The proposals for internal circulation within the site are unacceptable and will create conflicts between pedestrians, cyclists and vehicular movements thereby creating a safety hazard.

Object

Representation ID: 5877

Received: 31/10/2017

Respondent: Mr Paul Henry

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

The proposed development at MH3 is over-bearing, out-of-scale or out of character in terms of its appearance compared with existing development in the vicinity. The proposed siting of the development is particularly ill-considered: it is on a Green Field site and building here would both diminish the view over green fields and be prominent from most angles within the existing development on Kingston Way therefore reducing the social amenity for existing residents .

Object

Representation ID: 6300

Received: 02/11/2017

Respondent: Mr Richard Beer

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? Yes

Duty to co-operate? Yes

David Wilson proposed development at Burnmill farm is inconsistent with this objective in that in order to reduce the impact on the neigbouring properties on Bates Close and Kingston Way and protect the Ridgeline to the North will just squeeze the houses into the middle

Object

Representation ID: 6588

Received: 12/11/2017

Respondent: Mrs Penelope Fielden

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

This development WILL have a significant adverse effect on our living conditions due to its overbearing impact of building 1200 houses in a conservation village which has already been expanded by over 700.