MH3 1f.

Showing comments and forms 1 to 3 of 3

Object

Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 5666

Received: 01/11/2017

Respondent: Mrs N Stanley

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? Yes

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

Following exhibition by David Wilson Homes, there is little provision of open space, mainly covered by a balancing lagoon and little space for recreation. Open space along the southern boarder should be adequate all along it to protect privacy of existing residents as this site sits higher than the existing one. There will be an adverse effect and loss of residents amenity - loss of privacy and existing view, visual impact, effect on character of neighbourhood and additional noise. The site is on the periphery, density of housing should be low to reflect the landscape.

Full text:

Following exhibition by David Wilson Homes, there is little provision of open space, mainly covered by a balancing lagoon and little space for recreation. Open space along the southern boarder should be adequate all along it to protect privacy of existing residents as this site sits higher than the existing one. There will be an adverse effect and loss of residents amenity - loss of privacy and existing view, visual impact, effect on character of neighbourhood and additional noise. The site is on the periphery, density of housing should be low to reflect the landscape.

Object

Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 6309

Received: 02/11/2017

Respondent: Mr Richard Beer

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

sufficient space should be allowed to mitigate the impacts to existing residents

Full text:

sufficient space should be allowed to mitigate the impacts to existing residents

Object

Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 7008

Received: 17/11/2017

Respondent: Mr Jamie Buckby

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

The southern boundary of the site is unsuitable for development. The existing houses have been built at a much lower level to that of the field. Any houses built on the south boundary, next to the farm track, would be built at an elevated level and would have a serious impact on the privacy, light and view of the existing houses.

Full text:

The southern boundary of the site is unsuitable for development. The existing houses have been built at a much lower level to that of the field. Any houses built on the south boundary, next to the farm track, would be built at an elevated level and would have a serious impact on the privacy, light and view of the existing houses.