BE4 2a.

Showing comments and forms 1 to 2 of 2

Object

Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 5473

Received: 27/10/2017

Respondent: Mr Andy Johnson

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? Yes

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

Ancillary is a very loose term and can be open to interpretation. Development should be restricted to the uses allowed under the current planning permission.

Full text:

Ancillary is a very loose term and can be open to interpretation. Development should be restricted to the uses allowed under the current planning permission.

Object

Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 7235

Received: 17/11/2017

Respondent: C Walton Ltd

Agent: Marrons Solicitors

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

The criterion is not sound as it is not positively prepared and prevents any new development other that development which is considered ancillary to the existing uses on the Industrial Estate. Any future planning applications with employment generating uses for new companies allied with the range of sectors currently supported at BIE would therefore raise conflict with the policy. In its current form the policy is diametrically opposed to Paragraph 21 of the NPPF.

Full text:

See Attached documentation for full objection