BE4 1a.
Object
Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission
Representation ID: 5424
Received: 27/10/2017
Respondent: Mr Andy Johnson
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? Yes
Duty to co-operate? Yes
Ancillary is a very loose term and can be open to interpretation. Development should be restricted to the uses current allowed and no more.
Ancillary is a very loose term and can be open to interpretation. Development should be restricted to the uses current allowed and no more.
Object
Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission
Representation ID: 7191
Received: 17/11/2017
Respondent: Mr Tim Smith
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? Yes
Duty to co-operate? Yes
Maintenance and storage of aircraft if allowed to be subject to strict limits to protect the amenity of surrounding villages. Any development of p&t use to be subject to strict noise control.
Maintenance and storage of aircraft if allowed to be subject to strict limits to protect the amenity of surrounding villages. Any development of p&t use to be subject to strict noise control.
Object
Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission
Representation ID: 7204
Received: 17/11/2017
Respondent: C Walton Ltd
Agent: Marrons Solicitors
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Yes
The criteria is not sound as it prevents any new development other than development which is considered ancillary to the existing uses on site. Any future planning applications with employment generating uses for new companies allied with the range of sectors currently supported at BPG would therefore raise a conflict with the policy. in its current form, the policy is directly contrary to Para. 21 of the NPPF. The policy fails to comprehensively include all lawful and authorised uses on site, including the on-site research and development facilities, fleet management activities and the Events Centre.
See Attached documentation for full objection