H1 clause 6f - Gilmorton
Object
Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission
Representation ID: 7163
Received: 17/11/2017
Respondent: Gilmorton Parish Council
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Concerns regarding number of new houses. Village unable to sustain. Roads not able to cope with increased traffic.
indicatesan increase in dwellings in Gilmorton 25 homes. Presently growth of 200 homes either approveddevelopments or progressingthrough planning The infrastructurewithin the Village isnot suitable toaccommodate growthSurrounding roadsystem isnot suitable forthe increase in traffic flow, exacerbated by lack of public transport.
LutterworthEast development includes a spine road and closureGilmorton Road . TrafficCalming measures required in Gilmorton a.) what is behindthis comment b.) will webe consulted retype /location of measures. concerned Gilmorton will become 'ratrun' for traffic heading for southernLeicester.
Noting increase in the size of Lutterworth, Gilmorton PC seeks establishdefined area of separation ensuring identity of village not compromised.
Object
Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission
Representation ID: 7165
Received: 17/11/2017
Respondent: Gilmorton Parish Council
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Item 6f indicates an increase in the number of dwellings in Gilmorton by 25 homes. At present we are faced with growth of approximately 200 homes either from approved developments or those progressing through the planning process. The infrastructure within the Village is not suitable to accommodate this level of growth. The village and surrounding countryside road system is not suitable for the inevitable increase in traffic flow, exacerbated further by the lack of any public transport.
Item 6f indicates an increase in the number of dwellings in Gilmorton by 25 homes. At present we are faced with growth of approximately 200 homes either from approved developments or those progressing through the planning process. The infrastructure within the Village is not suitable to accommodate this level of growth. The village and surrounding countryside road system is not suitable for the inevitable increase in traffic flow, exacerbated further by the lack of any public transport.