iii. about 1,200 dwellings in a strategic development area at Scraptoft North

Showing comments and forms 1 to 5 of 5

Support

Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 5445

Received: 31/10/2017

Respondent: Mrs Elaine Derrick

Representation Summary:

Sound.
This is supported provided the necessary infrastructure such as roads, schools , public transport, health facilities are provided at the time of construction and are fit for purpose. Existing services of this nature are under immense pressure and unable to support the proposed number of dwellings and residents .
A planned community is not just another housing estate.
A major concern is that the consequential traffic flow through Scraptoft, Thurnby and Bushby without major highway improvements will make existing inadequate roads more dangerous and affect Community cohesion .
What regard has been paid to Air Quality for existing residents?

Full text:

Sound.
This is supported provided the necessary infrastructure such as roads, schools , public transport, health facilities are provided at the time of construction and are fit for purpose. Existing services of this nature are under immense pressure and unable to support the proposed number of dwellings and residents .
A planned community is not just another housing estate.
A major concern is that the consequential traffic flow through Scraptoft, Thurnby and Bushby without major highway improvements will make existing inadequate roads more dangerous and affect Community cohesion .
What regard has been paid to Air Quality for existing residents?

Object

Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 5633

Received: 27/10/2017

Respondent: Ms Caroline Pick

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

CPRE Leicestershire does not understand where the housing figures for Scraptoft have come from. They are certainly not in the Neighbourhood Plan. Are these houses proposed as part of the duty to co-operate with Leicester City? If so how was the figure arrived at?

Full text:

CPRE Leicestershire does not understand where the housing figures for Scraptoft have come from. They are certainly not in the Neighbourhood Plan. Are these houses proposed as part of the duty to co-operate with Leicester City? If so how was the figure arrived at?

Object

Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 6595

Received: 11/11/2017

Respondent: Mr Niles Holroyde

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Scale and nature of development.
Loss of Nature Reserve
Loss of trees on Golf Course.
Traffic disruption
Impact on social infrastructure

Full text:

I believe that insufficient publicity has been given to the allocation of a strategic development site on Scraptoft Golf Course. At the very least I would have expected the opportunity to view and discuss these plans at an exhibition or public meeting held in the village.

Scraptoft has been a building site for more than 15 years now, with over 700 houses built in the last 7 years. This has been very disruptive and local infrastructure has been stretched to breaking point.

A development of this size will inevitably harm local amenities and produce major traffic problems. The Nature Reserve must be protected as much for its historic importance as its wildlife value and the landscape value of the existing Golf Course must be protected.

I have no confidence that the social and transport infrastructure needed to support 1200 new homes will be provided. It will inevitably throw more strain on existing health and education and bring even more traffic through the village. It is also unclear how traffic from the site with find its way southwards towards Oadby, Fosse Park and M1. Given that plans have recently been published for an eastern by pass these plans are premature until there is more clarity about the provision of this new major road.

Object

Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 6616

Received: 03/11/2017

Respondent: Mr David Campbell

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Scraptoft has been intensively built in a short space to time. It should be more evenly distributed thoroughout the district.

Full text:

Proposed Development - Scraptoft North (SDA)

I believe this proposal is unsound.

The number of dwellings needs to be reduced at least by 50%

Access from the site onto the primary roads needs to be improved to a standard that could cope with 700 housed that have already been built in the last 7 years and any additional houses to be built on the SDA.

Keyham Lane West has already been widened in one part but there are still pinch points at Humberstone end and the Hamilton Lane end. It is already a bus route which the buses have to drive over the kerb or on the verge if another bus or lorry comes in the from the other direction. This route passes 3 schools and also has speed restrictions and speed calming in place. Vehicles are also parked alongside the route on one side.

Another route that might get used is New Romney Crescent and Nether Hall Road although this junction is also very busy onto Hungarton Boulevard and it passes a school.

Another route would be Scraptoft Lane, although the lane itself has less problems it wouldn't be a preferred choice due to how busy it gets just after it joins Uppingham Road. People wanting to get to South Leicester will have to use Station Road and would have to go through Scraptoft Village which doesn't cope at the present time with the amount of traffic using it now. Station Road backs up from Uppingham Road traffic lights at peak times upto Pulford Road for upto 20 minutes for your turn to get out. This route will also be used for the School run to Gartree and Beauchamp College. If the road from Keyham Lane West to Beeby Road was built it will make Beeby and Barkby a rat run for anybody wanting to go North East. Anyone wanting to go East will make Keyham a rat run. Barkbythorpe could also become congested due to so many people wanting to get to Thurmaston and surrounding areas. These are all country roads and not suitable for heavy traffic.

To make this plan sound you would have to improve Keyham Lane West so there was a minimum of a single lane in each direction without interruption giving current residents adequate parking to the properties and proper traffic light control for school pupils. Also improvement to all junctions that enter Keyham Lane with proper sight easements traffic light control onto the Thurmaston Lane/ Hungarton Boulevard roundabout. Station Road junction must operate more efficiently; with existing traffic and proposed traffic this junction will need widening so there is a minimum of two lanes in all directions approximately 50meters. The number of houses should be restricted to a maximum of 600 split into 2 sites, one site approximately 200 onto Beeby Road and second site approximately 400 houses access from Hamilton Lane.

Nature Reserve

It was agreed with Leicester City Council and Harborough District Council in 1999 it was sound then, it is even more sound now due to recent developments primarily Scraptoft Hall Development it appears to have become a major feeding ground to a number of birds there appears to have a balance of nature. Species seen dear, rabbits, foxes, kites, bats, owls, green woodpeckers, kingfisher, hedge sparrows, thrushes, yellow wag tails, robins, wrens, great-tits, chiff-chaffs, starlings, song thrushes, numerous butterflies. It would be beneficial to wildlife if the nature reserve was extended with a corridor through the existing golf course of around 100 metres wide to the open land north of the developments.
Refer to report by Sue Timms and Karen Headly for Leicestershire and Rutland Environmental Record Centre Leicestershire County Council report dated 18 May 2017.

It is also very important to keep the Green Wedge between Scraptoft and Leicester to maintain our village status identity and not to be swallowed up as suburb of Leicester.
Scraptoft has been intensively built in a short space to time it should be more evenly distributed thorough out the districts.

Object

Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 6725

Received: 15/11/2017

Respondent: Ms Shaveen Akhtar

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

The area is saturated with houses and cars already. Further development will completely overpower the local community and identity.

The congestion on Station Lane in peak hours is evidence that the nature of the area has been transformed and will be further with this development proposal. Also, the infrastructure is not present to support the population growth intended.

Full text:

The area is saturated with houses and cars already. Further development will completely overpower the local community and identity.

The congestion on Station Lane in peak hours is evidence that the nature of the area has been transformed and will be further with this development proposal. Also, the infrastructure is not present to support the population growth intended.