13.2.14 golf course explanation
Object
Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission
Representation ID: 5843
Received: 30/10/2017
Respondent: Mrs margaret Garven
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? Yes
Duty to co-operate? Yes
To destroy a well established golf course in Scraptoft in order to accommodate a large housing development and then re-create another golf course elsewhere seems to be somewhat illogical and unnecessary, The scale of such an undertaking will cause immense disruption to the Scraptoft area and to the neighbouring Leicester City residents. The Leicester City Council itself, who own the land on which part of the Golf course is situated, also, needs to consider the feasibility of this proposal and the impact it will have on the local community and the loss of a recreational facility.
To destroy a well established golf course in Scraptoft in order to accommodate a large housing development and then re-create another golf course elsewhere seems to be somewhat illogical and unnecessary, The scale of such an undertaking will cause immense disruption to the Scraptoft area and to the neighbouring Leicester City residents. The Leicester City Council itself, who own the land on which part of the Golf course is situated, also, needs to consider the feasibility of this proposal and the impact it will have on the local community and the loss of a recreational facility.
Object
Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission
Representation ID: 6957
Received: 17/11/2017
Respondent: kevin dias
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
it should remain where it is as it is adaquate
I totally object to the development of the 1200 new homes as it will cause major disruption to the area. I have concerns with traffic, noise, pollution, and the major disruption to the natural wildlife and greenery of the area. It will also have a massive impact to the schools, doctors surgeries, hospitals, and nurseries in the area which area currently struggling without the added pressure. The roads cannot handle the traffic now and I fail to see how an additional 1200 homes will manage.
it should remain where it is as it is adaquate
I totally object to the development of the 1200 new homes as it will cause major disruption to the area. I have concerns with traffic, noise, pollution, and the major disruption to the natural wildlife and greenery of the area. It will also have a massive impact to the schools, doctors surgeries, hospitals, and nurseries in the area which area currently struggling without the added pressure. The roads cannot handle the traffic now and I fail to see how an additional 1200 homes will manage.