SC1 clause 4

Showing comments and forms 1 to 7 of 7

Object

Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 5726

Received: 29/10/2017

Respondent: Ms Fiona Ashberry

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

I do not understand how it makes environmental sense to build on an existing golf course and create a replacement golf course elsewhere at huge expense and damage to the environment.

Full text:

I do not understand how it makes environmental sense to build on an existing golf course and create a replacement golf course elsewhere at huge expense and damage to the environment.

Object

Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 6544

Received: 02/11/2017

Respondent: Miss Chloe Bibby

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Golf course should stay in Scraptoft.

Full text:

I was born on Beeby Road adjacent to the Local Nature Reserve. My earliest memories are that of cows in the field tended by my great uncle William till. Myself and my parents and our dogs have all been a part of this community and have, wherever needed, gave up time to help with local matters concerning the village and LNR.
My father is a member of the golf course and wants it to stay in Scraptoft. The council has refused to re-let the land on which 4 of the golf holes are situated which is a very bullish attitude to all the members, a lot of whom have been members for more years than I have been born.
Leicester council have land, which was at one time also tenanted by SGC and now lies in ruins just north east of the LNR which can be used to facilitate housing rather than ruining the enjoyment and giving a lot of upheaval to members.

Parker's can find land elsewhere beyond the boundaries of the LNR and golf course suitable for housing or simply lower the quota for Scraptoft and surrounding villages. We simply do not have the infrastructure either for this sort of project, the roads are not sufficient, the villages and junctions will become totally clogged with traffic and Scraptoft is a very tight one way road system. Please do not ruin what we have left as recreation and countryside. The LNR has been left alone for years, it has grown and matured and the amazing amount of wildlife within it and around it is all now threatened because of targets, please do not let this happen.

Object

Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 6671

Received: 15/11/2017

Respondent: Mrs Penelope Fielden

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

SGC has an illustrious history on its present site and is well known and liked. It provides great recreational facility with added bonus of being part of our Green Wedge.
Leicester City Council has held it hostage over not allowing the lease on 4 holes to be renewed. Golf Club doesn't want to move and we don't want it to! Proposing to build replacement course other side of Houghton seems mad - Harborough need to preserve what we already have and not give in to pressure from Leicester.
Too many provisos listed below to allow for not building replacement anyway!

Full text:

SGC has an illustrious history on its present site and is well known and liked. It provides great recreational facility with added bonus of being part of our Green Wedge.
Leicester City Council has held it hostage over not allowing the lease on 4 holes to be renewed. Golf Club doesn't want to move and we don't want it to! Proposing to build replacement course other side of Houghton seems mad - Harborough need to preserve what we already have and not give in to pressure from Leicester.
Too many provisos listed below to allow for not building replacement anyway!

Object

Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 6886

Received: 16/11/2017

Respondent: Ms Bindu Modi

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Scraptoft Golf club is a very popular course to local golf enthusiasts many of whom dont want to move. The owners at the Scraptoft golf club are greedy and dont really need to move

Full text:

Scraptoft Golf club is a very popular course to local golf enthusiasts many of whom dont want to move. The owners at the Scraptoft golf club are greedy and dont really need to move

Object

Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 7154

Received: 17/11/2017

Respondent: Mrs Jennifer Smith

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Why close a perfectly good golf course in Scraptoft, to then rebuild one 5 miles up the road. It doesn't make sense

Full text:

Why close a perfectly good golf course in Scraptoft, to then rebuild one 5 miles up the road. It doesn't make sense

Support

Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 7272

Received: 17/11/2017

Respondent: mr Colin Griffiths

Representation Summary:

Scraptoft Golf Club, background and general position of the Golf club in support of the plan, in particular Scraptoft North development and New Golf Course. see the enclosed attachment.

Full text:

Scraptoft Golf Club, background and general position of the Golf club in support of the plan, in particular Scraptoft North development and New Golf Course. see the enclosed attachment.

Object

Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 7558

Received: 17/11/2017

Respondent: Parker Strategic Land Limited

Agent: Mr Andrew Hiorns

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

The boundary shown for the proposed golf course (shaded green with a red boundary) is incorrect and not the area now being promoted for the golf course.

Full text:

4. Land to the east of Houghton on the Hill, as shown on the Policies Map, is allocated for a replacement golf course

Our comments relate to the area defined on Inset Map 55 (Houghton on the Hill). The boundary shown for the proposed golf course (shaded green with a red boundary) is incorrect and not the area now being promoted for the golf course. The Policies Map should be updated to correspond to the area being planned for the golf course. For clarity, we have attached two plans of the proposed boundary. Plan ST 15452-SO1 shows the proposed site boundary on a 1:10,000 scale Ordnance survey base, the second draws the proposed site boundary on the Inset Map 55 (Houghton on the Hill) to show the changes.