Key issue 6: Climate change

Showing comments and forms 1 to 4 of 4

Support

Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 5625

Received: 27/10/2017

Respondent: Ms Caroline Pick

Representation Summary:

We support this

Full text:

We support this

Support

Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 6120

Received: 01/11/2017

Respondent: Mr Peter Jones

Representation Summary:

Every encouragement should be given to low carbon technology investments to promote reduced energy emissions -especially in relation to domestic CHP. This policy demands more than lip service at a time when (as this consultation closes ) major domestic estates continue to be consented without insistence on shared heat generation from boreholes or electricity from PV as standard.
Here in North Kilworth retrospective consents on large areas of non SUDS compliant developments are a fact.Hopefully these new policies will be implemented and enforced.

Full text:

Every encouragement should be given to low carbon technology investments to promote reduced energy emissions -especially in relation to domestic CHP. This policy demands more than lip service at a time when (as this consultation closes ) major domestic estates continue to be consented without insistence on shared heat generation from boreholes or electricity from PV as standard.
Here in North Kilworth retrospective consents on large areas of non SUDS compliant developments are a fact.Hopefully these new policies will be implemented and enforced.

Support

Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 6809

Received: 16/11/2017

Respondent: Environment Agency

Representation Summary:

The Environment Agency welcomes the inclusion of, and wording of Key issue 6.

Full text:

The Environment Agency welcomes the inclusion of, and wording of Key issue 6.

Object

Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 7007

Received: 17/11/2017

Respondent: Mr Simon Smith

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

The unjustified proposed conclusion of an additional 700000sqm of development for distribution in the current draft local plan, in conflict with the current core strategy and local plan options document recommendations, is directly in conflict with this policy of targeting emissions in greenhouse gases and climate change as there is no employment requirement in the district from the weight of evidence so workers will be commuting long distances adding to emissions from vehicles.

Full text:

The un justified proposed conclusion of an additional 700000sqm of development for distribution in the current draft local plan in conflict with the current core strategy and local plan options document recommendations is directly in conflict with this policy of targeting emissions in greenhouse gasses and climate change as there is no employment requirement in the district from the weight of evidence so . workers will be commuting long distances adding to emissions from vehicles.