6.3.1 to 6.3.6 BE2 Explanation

Showing comments and forms 1 to 2 of 2

Object

Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 6348

Received: 02/11/2017

Respondent: Magna Park is Big Enough

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

The need has not been identified to be focussed at such high density in one area; there is no evidence to justify the correlation between housing allocation and B8 allocation; a sustainable reduction in out-commuting simply will not be achieved.

Full text:

The need has not been identified to be focussed at such high density in one area; there is no evidence to justify the correlation between housing allocation and B8 allocation; a sustainable reduction in out-commuting simply will not be achieved

Object

Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 6819

Received: 16/11/2017

Respondent: Richard Whittington

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

The Magna Park development goes against the Core Strategy 2006-2028 from14/11/11.
There is very little unemployment in this area so, new employees would have to travel from outside the area therefore increasing traffic.
Would any apprenticeships be worthwhile for their future prospects?
The A426 is already overloaded and there are frequently queues from the M6 to the A5in the afternoons.
I am a keen astronomer and would not welcome any further light pollution to an already over polluted area.

Full text:

The Magna Park development goes against the Core Strategy 2006-2028 from14/11/11.
There is very little unemployment in this area so, new employees would have to travel from outside the area therefore increasing traffic.
Would any apprenticeships be worthwhile for their future prospects?
The A426 is already overloaded and there are frequently queues from the M6 to the A5in the afternoons.
I am a keen astronomer and would not welcome any further light pollution to an already over polluted area.