4.11 GD6 Explanation
Object
Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission
Representation ID: 5949
Received: 02/11/2017
Respondent: Mr John Martin
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Yes
The area of separation between Market Harborough and Lubenham was promised to be established and maintained until at least 2031 at the public meeting when the planning application by Linden Homes as part of the Airfield Farm SDA was allowed. This does not appear in the plan.
The area of separation between Market Harborough and Lubenham was promised to be established and maintained until at least 2031 at the public meeting when the planning application by Linden Homes as part of the Airfield Farm SDA was allowed. This does not appear in the plane
Object
Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission
Representation ID: 7037
Received: 17/11/2017
Respondent: Ullesthorpe Parish Council
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Policy GD6 of the proposed Local Plan suggests an Area of Separation should be implemented between Bitteswell/Lutterworth/Magna Park, to maintain separation of both Lutterworth and Bitteswell from Magna Park. There is no mention in the proposed Local Plan of maintaining an Area of Separation between Magna Park and Ullesthorpe who are equally at risk.
Policy GD6 of the proposed Local Plan suggests an Area of Separation should be implemented between Bitteswell/Lutterworth/Magna Park, to maintain separation of both Lutterworth and Bitteswell from Magna Park. There is no mention in the proposed Local Plan of maintaining an Area of Separation between Magna Park and Ullesthorpe who are equally at risk.
Object
Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission
Representation ID: 7177
Received: 17/11/2017
Respondent: Mr Nelson Renner
Agent: Town Planning Services
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
The area of separation between Scraptoft and Thurnby Bushby has been deleted without any technical consideration of evidence. The Green Wedge that has replaced the Area of Separation covers a different area. There has been no justification for the change. There is also no technical justification or evidence provided to support the exclusion of land from what was the Area of Separation south of Covert Lane, land that has now been excluded from the new Green Wedge designation.
The Area of Separation between Scraptoft and Thurnby Bushby has been deleted. The deletion of this area was not assessed within the Area of Separation Review, April 2017. Whilst it is acknowledged that the Area of Separation boundary should be changed to reflect new development permitted within that area, there has been no justification given for the deletion of the designated area in its entirety.
Paragraph 4.11.3 refers to the Area of Separation defined within the Adopted Scraptoft Neighbourhood Plan, highlighting that this has been replaced by a Green Wedge designation. The Green Wedge does not cover the same area and excludes fields to the south of Covert Lane that have been protected by the Area of Separation throughout the life of the Adopted Local Plan. New fields north of Thurnby Brook have been added into the Green Wedge designation, which reduce the function of the Area of Separation.
No technical evidence or assessment has been provided to support this change, which is not compliant with the NPPF or the Adopted Scraptoft Neighbourhood Plan.
Object
Harborough Local Plan 2011-2031, Proposed Submission
Representation ID: 7193
Received: 17/11/2017
Respondent: LUBENHAM Parish Council
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
The Lubenham Separation area should be afforded the same priority as the Great Bowden separation area - both villages are adjacent to Market Harborough.Residents have expressed their views through the Lubenham Neighbourhood Plan and therefore it should be included in the Policy above
The Lubenham Separation area should be afforded the same priority as the Great Bowden separation area - both villages are adjacent to Market Harborough.Residents have expressed their views through the Lubenham Neighbourhood Plan and therefore it should be included in the Policy above