Strategic Distribution Option B

Showing comments and forms 31 to 37 of 37

Comment

Sustainability Appraisal - Second Interim SA Report Appraising Options for the Provision of Strategic Distribution Growth (Feb 2016)

Representation ID: 5292

Received: 16/03/2016

Respondent: Anglian Water Services Ltd

Representation Summary:

No further comment.

Comment

Sustainability Appraisal - Second Interim SA Report Appraising Options for the Provision of Strategic Distribution Growth (Feb 2016)

Representation ID: 5296

Received: 15/03/2016

Respondent: Daventry District Council

Representation Summary:

It is considered that Options A and B are the most appropriate

Comment

Sustainability Appraisal - Second Interim SA Report Appraising Options for the Provision of Strategic Distribution Growth (Feb 2016)

Representation ID: 5310

Received: 15/03/2016

Respondent: Ms Kerry-Anne Browne

Representation Summary:

I unequivocally object entirely to any further development and/or expansion to Magna Park.

Comment

Sustainability Appraisal - Second Interim SA Report Appraising Options for the Provision of Strategic Distribution Growth (Feb 2016)

Representation ID: 5320

Received: 15/03/2016

Respondent: Mr W Carlton

Representation Summary:

Any further expansion, whether by option B at 88 h. and/or option C at 232 h. will far exceed any estimates of need identified for the whole County.

Comment

Sustainability Appraisal - Second Interim SA Report Appraising Options for the Provision of Strategic Distribution Growth (Feb 2016)

Representation ID: 5324

Received: 16/03/2016

Respondent: Historic England

Representation Summary:

We draw your authority's attention to the importance of the detailed advice of the County Council Development Control Archaeologists in respect of sufficient information to make a safe and evidence based determination.

Additional information should be such that a sufficient understanding of the archaeological potential of the site and the context of historic finds in the vicinity of the site can be properly understood.

Your authority should also ensure that the applicant's assertions (re.Option B) as to lack of indivisibility between the listed buildings in Cotesbach and the site have been properly evidenced and tested to your authority's satisfaction such that Special Regard can be afforded by you in line with the 1990 Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas Act.

Comment

Sustainability Appraisal - Second Interim SA Report Appraising Options for the Provision of Strategic Distribution Growth (Feb 2016)

Representation ID: 5332

Received: 16/03/2016

Respondent: Environment Agency

Representation Summary:

According to Environment Agency maps land in the south-eastern corner (Option B site) lies within Flood Zone 3. The extent of Flood Zone is limited to the channel of the watercourse at that location, where development is unlikely. Notwithstanding this the LPA should be satisfied that the site is sequentially preferable from a flooding perspective.
No in-principle objection to the development (of Option A), subject to appropriate mitigation measures. However, preferred option for any detailed proposal would be for the watercourse to be retained to convey only existing fluvial flows and that a separate surface water drainage SuDs system is provided to manage surface water run-off from the site. Guidance is provided to ensure no increase in flood risk, or deterioration of the existing waterbody as a result of development and to improve and protect water quality, habitat and amenity.
Development that encroaches on the Padge Hall Brook has a potentially severe impact on ecological value. Opportunities to incorporate biodiversity in and around developments should be encouraged.

Comment

Sustainability Appraisal - Second Interim SA Report Appraising Options for the Provision of Strategic Distribution Growth (Feb 2016)

Representation ID: 5336

Received: 16/03/2016

Respondent: IDI Gazeley

Agent: Now Planning

Representation Summary:

* Option B, a new development to the south of Magna Park, is not an extension to an existing site.

* Site does not adhere to SDSS advice on site selection. Not an extension to an existing site (only in proximity to), and does not make use of Magna Park's existing infrastructure or management.