Strategic Distribution Option A

Showing comments and forms 31 to 36 of 36

Comment

Sustainability Appraisal - Second Interim SA Report Appraising Options for the Provision of Strategic Distribution Growth (Feb 2016)

Representation ID: 5309

Received: 15/03/2016

Respondent: Ms Kerry-Anne Browne

Representation Summary:

I unequivocally object entirely to any further development and/or expansion to Magna Park.

Comment

Sustainability Appraisal - Second Interim SA Report Appraising Options for the Provision of Strategic Distribution Growth (Feb 2016)

Representation ID: 5319

Received: 15/03/2016

Respondent: Mr W Carlton

Representation Summary:

Option A at 37 hectares is now permitted development (15/00919) thus pre-empting the Local Plan consultation process.

Comment

Sustainability Appraisal - Second Interim SA Report Appraising Options for the Provision of Strategic Distribution Growth (Feb 2016)

Representation ID: 5323

Received: 16/03/2016

Respondent: Historic England

Representation Summary:

Some harm to the significance of the scheduled ancient monument (Bittesby Medival Village) will likely result from Option A, in terms of additional intrusion into its setting particuarly in views from the north end of the medieval village looking east. Although this will be to an extent mitigated by the reinforcement of historic boundary planting.

Whilst impacts are not in our view likely to be great, from Option A, they should still be weighed by your authority against public benefits.

You should also ensure sufficent understanding of the extent and potential nature of any impacts upon water supply and flow characteristics to Claybrook Mill (a Grade II listed building).

With regard to comparative and cumulative impacts between schemes (options)adjacent to Magna Park we refer you to the outcome of this consultation and your strategic consideration of options for expansion.

Comment

Sustainability Appraisal - Second Interim SA Report Appraising Options for the Provision of Strategic Distribution Growth (Feb 2016)

Representation ID: 5329

Received: 16/03/2016

Respondent: Environment Agency

Representation Summary:

The existing on-site seweage treatment plant would likely need to make provision for extra flow generated by the development of the site.

Comment

Sustainability Appraisal - Second Interim SA Report Appraising Options for the Provision of Strategic Distribution Growth (Feb 2016)

Representation ID: 5331

Received: 16/03/2016

Respondent: Environment Agency

Representation Summary:

Foul sewerage generated by development will need to be accommodated, if via the existing on-site sewerage treatment plant then provision for the extra flow may be required. An application will need to be made under the Environmental Permitting Regulations to increase the flow discharging to the watercourse.

Comment

Sustainability Appraisal - Second Interim SA Report Appraising Options for the Provision of Strategic Distribution Growth (Feb 2016)

Representation ID: 5335

Received: 16/03/2016

Respondent: IDI Gazeley

Agent: Now Planning

Representation Summary:

Operational area of Option A is 22ha (as per planning application) not 37ha.
Site is for DHL and does not allow for further expansion of Magna Park, no rationale for adding land or treating site as an option (has planning consent)
Site does not account for 40% of need (even if 107ha were a precise figure)
Site accords 'completely' (not broadly adheres) to SDSS recommended site selection approach & criteria


There is no basis for associating Option A with a local only need. The DHL supply chain operation draws on demand that could be met anywhere in the Golden Triangle.