Strategic Distribution Option A

Showing comments and forms 1 to 14 of 14

Comment

Sustainability Appraisal - Second Interim SA Report Appraising Options for the Provision of Strategic Distribution Growth (Feb 2016)

Representation ID: 5099

Received: 29/02/2016

Respondent: MR Michael Wilcox

Representation Summary:

This is contrary to planning policy and public opinion and creats a precedent for further expansion of Magna Park

Comment

Sustainability Appraisal - Second Interim SA Report Appraising Options for the Provision of Strategic Distribution Growth (Feb 2016)

Representation ID: 5103

Received: 03/03/2016

Respondent: BROUGHTON ASTLEY Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Broughton Astley Parish Council would not like to amend any previous comments, subject to ratification by the Parish Council, at the meeting to be held on Thursday 17 March 2016.

Comment

Sustainability Appraisal - Second Interim SA Report Appraising Options for the Provision of Strategic Distribution Growth (Feb 2016)

Representation ID: 5128

Received: 07/03/2016

Respondent: mrs vera mcbay

Representation Summary:

This should not have been passed no regard for local opinons or the chaos this is going to cause

Comment

Sustainability Appraisal - Second Interim SA Report Appraising Options for the Provision of Strategic Distribution Growth (Feb 2016)

Representation ID: 5136

Received: 09/03/2016

Respondent: LUTTERWORTH TOWN COUNCIL Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Lutterworth Town Council wishes to repeat its previous objections in relation to these options that do not appear to have been addressed to date.

Comment

Sustainability Appraisal - Second Interim SA Report Appraising Options for the Provision of Strategic Distribution Growth (Feb 2016)

Representation ID: 5154

Received: 13/03/2016

Respondent: Mrs Kathleen Rowell

Representation Summary:

This already has planning permission why is it included again in this consultation, unnecessary and confusing! This provides 37 hectares of the 107 needed look elsewhere in the region for the remaining amount

Comment

Sustainability Appraisal - Second Interim SA Report Appraising Options for the Provision of Strategic Distribution Growth (Feb 2016)

Representation ID: 5162

Received: 13/03/2016

Respondent: Ian Lewis

Representation Summary:

A has already been approved so 37 hectares of the total 107 needed. Perhaps the rest could be found elsewhere in the county/region.

Comment

Sustainability Appraisal - Second Interim SA Report Appraising Options for the Provision of Strategic Distribution Growth (Feb 2016)

Representation ID: 5184

Received: 14/03/2016

Respondent: Mrs Shiela Carlton

Representation Summary:

No

Comment

Sustainability Appraisal - Second Interim SA Report Appraising Options for the Provision of Strategic Distribution Growth (Feb 2016)

Representation ID: 5206

Received: 15/03/2016

Respondent: mr christopher dodd

Representation Summary:

My representations made on the earlier applications remain the same

Comment

Sustainability Appraisal - Second Interim SA Report Appraising Options for the Provision of Strategic Distribution Growth (Feb 2016)

Representation ID: 5212

Received: 15/03/2016

Respondent: Suzanne Hayto

Representation Summary:

I thought option A had already been approved? Why is it included in the consultation paper?

Comment

Sustainability Appraisal - Second Interim SA Report Appraising Options for the Provision of Strategic Distribution Growth (Feb 2016)

Representation ID: 5229

Received: 15/03/2016

Respondent: Ashby Parva Parish Meeting

Representation Summary:

Option A has already been decided, so this part of the 'consultation'' has no meaning. However, the 'net' area of 37 hectares makes large inroads in the 107 ha. of new land said to be needed across Leicestershire and leaves 70 to be found elsewhere. Harborough has provided more (34%) than its fair share .

Comment

Sustainability Appraisal - Second Interim SA Report Appraising Options for the Provision of Strategic Distribution Growth (Feb 2016)

Representation ID: 5240

Received: 16/03/2016

Respondent: Mr Brian Fowler

Representation Summary:

Option A has already been approved and given permission so it should not be included in this consultation other than to hoodwink members of the public. A total of 37 hectares of the 107 have been approved, Other options must be examined for the balance at other and better placed sites in the region.

Comment

Sustainability Appraisal - Second Interim SA Report Appraising Options for the Provision of Strategic Distribution Growth (Feb 2016)

Representation ID: 5253

Received: 16/03/2016

Respondent: Mr Graham Logan

Representation Summary:

Option A has already been approved by HDC so it is utterly pointless to consult the public on a done deal!
Please read the 900 written objections to this plan even though HDC totally disregards localism and local democracy in favour of grabbing the many millions of pounds that each one of these unwanted and unjustified plans generates for the local authority!
Please see my overall representation above.
Plans of these immense scale are of regional/national importance and should, more properly, be determined strategically by a higher authority than a relatively small district council desperate for all of the extra business rates.

Comment

Sustainability Appraisal - Second Interim SA Report Appraising Options for the Provision of Strategic Distribution Growth (Feb 2016)

Representation ID: 5260

Received: 16/03/2016

Respondent: Edmund Hunt

Representation Summary:

This has already been consented and therefore should not be evaluated.
Option C assessment should not include land allocation of option A to make sure apples with apples are being compared.

Comment

Sustainability Appraisal - Second Interim SA Report Appraising Options for the Provision of Strategic Distribution Growth (Feb 2016)

Representation ID: 5288

Received: 16/03/2016

Respondent: Anglian Water Services Ltd

Representation Summary:

No further comment.